politicalscienceВестник РГГУ. Серия “Политология. История. Международные отношения.”RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"2073-6339Издательский центр Российского государственного гуманитарного университета10.28995/2073-6339-2019-4-10-22politicalscience-264Research ArticleМЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ: ИСТОРИЯ, ТЕОРИЯ, СОЦИОКУЛЬТУРНАЯ ПРАКТИКАINTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: HISTORY, THEORY, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL PRACTICES AND METHODOLOGYИстория холодной войны как история эмоций: на примере гонки ядерных вооруженийThe history of the Cold War as a history of emotions: A nuclear arms race caseАванскаяВ. А.AvanskayaV. A.

Виктория А. Аванская, аспирант

125993, Россия, Москва, Миусская пл., д. 6

Victoria A. Avanskaya, postgraduate student

bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, Russia, 125993

viktysa@mail.ruРоссийский государственный гуманитарный университетРоссияRussian State University for the HumanitiesRussian Federation201905032020041022Copyright © Аванская В.А., 20202020Аванская В.А.Avanskaya V.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://politicalscience.rsuh.ru/jour/article/view/264

В последние 20 лет началось систематическое изучение эмоций в различных областях знаний, в том числе в международных отношениях. Это привело к развитию новой методологии изучения эмоций, а также к росту количества работ, в которых эта методология используется.

В статье намечаются перспективы применения методологии изучения эмоций в международных отношениях на примере гонки ядерных вооружений. Она была важным фактором холодной войны и провоцировала разнообразные эмоции у всех ее участников: страх, тревогу, гнев, надежду. Избранная методология позволяет уточнить и углубить знания о происходивших в тот период политических и социальных процессах, таких как формирование идентичности, восприятие друг друга, ведение публичной политики и принятие политических решений.

In the past 20 years, a systematic study of emotions has begun in various fields of knowledge, including international relations. This led to the development of a new methodology for studying emotions, as well as to an increase in the number of works in which this methodology is being used.

The article outlines the prospects of applying the methodology for the study of emotions in international relations on the example of a nuclear arms race. It was an important factor in the Cold War and provoked a variety of emotions among all its participants: fear, anxiety, anger, hope. The chosen methodology allows us to clarify and deepen knowledge about political and social processes that took place at that time, such as the formation of identity, the perception of each other, the conduct of public politics and political decision-making.

холодная войнагонка ядерных вооруженийсоциальные эмоциигрупповые эмоциимеждународные отношенияcold warnuclear arms racesocial emotionsgroup emotionsinternational relationsReferencesАванская 2018 – Аванская В.А. Методология изучения эмоций в международных отношениях // Вестник РГГУ. Серия «Политология. История. Международные отношения». 2018. № 3. С. 43–60.Avanskaya, V.A. (2018), “Methodology for studying emotions in international relations”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Political Science. History. International Relations” Series, no. 3, pp. 43-60.Воробьева 2015 – Воробьева О.В. «Индустрия эмоций»: институциональные и интеллектуальные ресурсы истории эмоций [Электронный ресурс] // Электронный научно-образовательный журнал «История». 2015. Т. 6. № 9 (42). URL: http://history.jes.su/s207987840001247-0-1 (дата обращения: 6 нояб. 2018).Burns, R.D. and Siracusa, J.M. (2013), A global history of the nuclear arms race. Weapons, strategy and politics, ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, USA.Burns, Siracusa 2014 – Burns R.D., Siracusa J.M. A global history of the nuclear arms race. Weapons, strategy and politics. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. 640 p.Damasio, A. (2000), The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness, Vintage, London, UK.Damasio 2000 – Damasio A. The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. London: Vintage, 2000. 400 p.Erisen, C. and Villalobos, J. (2014), “Exploring the invocation of emotion in presidential speeches”, Contemporary Politics, vol. 20, pp. 469–488.Erisen, Villalobos 2014 – Erisen C., Villalobos J. Exploring the invocation of emotion in presidential speeches // Contemporary Politics. 2014. No. 4. P. 469–488.Eznack, L. (2011), “Crises as signals of strength: The significance of affect in close allies’ relationships”, Security Studies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 238–265.Eznack 2011 – Eznack L. Crises as signals of strength: The significance of affect in close allies’ relationships // Security Studies. 2011. No. 2. P. 238–265.Hall, H.T. and Ross, A.A.G. (2019), “Rethinking affective experience and popular emotion: World War I and the construction of group emotion in international relations”, Political Psychology, [Online], available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pops.12608 (Accessed 2 Aug 2019).Hall, Ross 2019 – Hall T.H., Ross A.A.G. Rethinking affective experience and popular emotion: World War I and the construction of group emotion in international relations [Электронный ресурс] // Political Psychology. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pops.12608 (дата обращения: 2 авг. 2019).Holloway, D. (2010), “Nuclear weapons and the escalation of the Cold War, 1945–1962”, in: Leffler, M. and Westad, O. (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Cold War, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 376–397.Holloway 2010 – Holloway D. Nuclear weapons and the escalation of the Cold War, 1945–1962 / Ed. by M. Leffler, O. Westad. The Cambridge History of the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. P. 376–397.Holmes, M. (2018), Face-to-face diplomacy: Social neuroscience and international relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Holmes 2018 – Holmes M. Face-to-face diplomacy: Social neuroscience and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. 317 p.Hutchison, E. (2010), “Trauma and the politics of emotions: Constituting identity, security and community after the Bali bombing”, International Relations, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 65–86.Hutchison 2010 – Hutchison E. Trauma and the politics of emotions: Constituting identity, security and community after the Bali bombing // International Relations. 2010. No. 2. P. 65–86.Hutchison, E. and Bleiker, R. (2017), “Emotions, discourse and power in world politics”, International Studies Review, no. 19, p. 501–508.Hutchison, Bleiker 2014 – Hutchison E., Bleiker R. Theorizing emotions in world politics // International Theory. 2014. No. 3. P. 491–514.Hutchison, E., and Bleiker, R. (2014), “Theorizing emotions in world politics”, International Theory, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 491–514.Hutchison, Bleiker 2017 – Hutchison E., Bleiker R. Emotions, discourse and power in world politics // International Studies Review. 2017. No. 19. P. 501–508.Koschut, S. (2016), “The structure of feeling – emotion culture and national self-sacrifice in world politics”, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 174–192.Koschut 2016 – Koschut S. The structure of feeling – emotion culture and national self-sacrifice in world politics. Millennium // Journal of International Studies. 2016. No. 2. P. 174–192.Koschut, S. (2018), “The power of (emotion) words: On the importance of emotions for social constructivist discourse analysis in IR”, Journal of International Relations and Development, vol. 21, pp. 495–522.Koschut 2018 – Koschut S. The power of (emotion) words: On the importance of emotions for social constructivist discourse analysis in IR // Journal of International Relations and Development. 2018. No. 21. P. 495–522.Leffler, M., and Westad, O. (eds.) (2010), The Cambridge history of the Cold War, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Leffler, Westad 2010 – The Cambridge history of the Cold War / Ed. by M. Leffler, O. Westad. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 552 p.Matsumoto, D., Frank, M.G. and Hwang, H.C. (2015), “The role of intergroup emotions in political violence”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 369–373.Matsumoto, Frank, Hwang 2015 – Matsumoto D., Frank M.G., Hwang H.C. The role of intergroup emotions in political violence // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2015. No. 5. P. 369–373.Mercer, J. (2013), “Emotion and strategy in the Korean War”, International Organization, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 221–252.Mercer 2013 – Mercer J. Emotion and strategy in the Korean War // International Organization. 2013. No. 2. P. 221–252.Mercer, J. (2014), “Feeling like a state: Social emotion and identity”, International Theory, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 515–535.Mercer 2014 – Mercer J. Feeling like a state: Social emotion and identity // International Theory. 2014. No. 3. P. 515–535.Sasley, B. (2011), “Theorizing states’ emotions”, International Studies Review, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 452–476.Sasley 2011 – Sasley B. Theorizing states’ emotions // International Studies Review. 2011. No. 3. P. 452–476.Spencer, B. (2014), “From atomic shelters to arms control: Libraries, civil defense, and American militarism during the Cold War”, Information & Culture: A Journal of History, vol. 49, pp. 351–385.Spencer 2014 – Spencer B. From atomic shelters to arms control: Libraries, civil defense, and American militarism during the Cold War // Information & Culture: A Journal of History. 2014. No. 49. P. 351–385.Van Stekelenburg, J. (2017), “Radicalization and violent emotions”, PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 936–939.Van Stekelenburg 2017 – Van Stekelenburg J. Radicalization and violent emotions // PS: Political Science & Politics. 2017. No. 4. P. 936–939.Van Troost, D., Van Stekelenburg, J. and Klandermans, B. (2013), “Emotions of protest”, in: Demertzis, N. (ed.), Emotions in politics: The affect dimension in political tension, Palgrave Macmillan Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 186–203.Van Troost, Van Stekelenburg, Klandermans 2013 – Van Troost D., Van Stekelenburg J., Klandermans B. “Emotions of protest” // Emotions in politics: The affect dimension in political tension / Ed. by N. Demertzis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers, 2013. P. 186–203.Von Scheve, Ch. and Ismer, S. (2013), “Towards a theory of collective emotions”, Emotion Review, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 406–413.Von Scheve, Ismer 2013 – Von Scheve Ch., Ismer S. Towards a theory of collective emotions // Emotion Review. 2013. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 406–413.Vorob’eva, О.V. (2015), “ ‘Emotion industry’: Institutional and intellectual resources of the history of emotions ”, [Online], Electronic scientific and educational journal “History”, vol. 6, no. 9, available at: http://history.jes.su/s207987840001247-0-1 (Accessed 6 Nov 2018).Weart 2012 – Weart S. The rise of nuclear fear. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press, 2012. 367 p.Weart, S. (2012), The rise of nuclear fear, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.