<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">politicalscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник РГГУ. Серия “Политология. История. Международные отношения.”</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2073-6339</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Издательский центр Российского государственного гуманитарного университета</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.28995/2073-6339-2024-2-88-99</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">politicalscience-588</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СТРАНЫ И РЕГИОНЫ МИРА: ДИНАМИКА РАЗВИТИЯ И МОДЕЛИ ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>COUNTRIES AND REGIONS OF THE WORLD: DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS AND MODELS OF COOPERATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Приоритеты развития энергетической политики США в 2012–2023 гг.</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Priorities for the development of U.S. energy policy in 2012–2023</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сидорова</surname><given-names>Е. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Sidorova</surname><given-names>E. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Елизавета С. Сидорова, аспирант</p><p>119991, Москва, Ленинские горы, д. 1</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Elizaveta S. Sidorova, postgraduate student</p><p>1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">sidorova.elizaveta@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>88</fpage><lpage>99</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Сидорова Е.С., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Сидорова Е.С.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Sidorova E.S.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://politicalscience.rsuh.ru/jour/article/view/588">https://politicalscience.rsuh.ru/jour/article/view/588</self-uri><abstract><p>Сланцевая революция начала XXI   в. кардинальным образом изменила энергетический облик США, превратив страну в одного из крупнейших экспортеров углеводородов. Столь существенные трансформации не могли не сказаться на том, как Вашингтон позиционирует себя на глобальном рынке энергетики и как подходит к определению своих национальных интересов в данной области. Статья посвящена сопоставлению подходов трех последних администраций к этому вопросу.</p><p>Несмотря на то что значительный пласт отечественных и зарубежных исследований сфокусирован на настойчивом стремлении каждого нового политического руководства максимально дистанцироваться от своих предшественников, последовательный анализ документов стратегического планирования, затрагивающих проблемы развития топливно-энергетического комплекса США, а также специфику выстраивания отношений с другими акторами международной энергетической системы, позволяет сделать вывод о том, что в основе соответствующей политики Вашингтона лежит неизменный императив достижения ресурсной самодостаточности, обретения доминирующих позиций на мировом рынке. Данное обстоятельство свидетельствует об эволюционном характере изменений в энергетической доктрине США в  2012–2023   гг. в соответствии с характерной для страны ментальностью глобального лидерства.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The shale revolution of the early 21st century has radically changed the energy image of the United States, turning the country into one of the largest exporters of hydrocarbons. Such significant transformations could not but affect how Washington positions itself in the global energy market and how it defines its national interests in this sphere. The article is dedicated to the juxtaposition between the approaches of the last three administrations to this issue.</p><p>Despite the fact that a significant body of domestic and foreign research focuses on the persistent desire of each new political leadership to maximally distance itself from its predecessors, a consistent analysis of the strategic documents on the development of the U.S. fuel and energy complex, as well as on the specifics of building relations with other actors of the international energy system, allows  us  to  make a conclusion  that  Washington’s policy  is  based on the constant imperative of achieving resource self-sufficiency and gaining a dominant position in  the  global  market. Such a circumstance indicates  the evolutionary nature of the changes in the 2012–2023 US energy doctrine, and it occurred in full compliance with the global leadership mentality which is typical for the country.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>США</kwd><kwd>Б. Обама</kwd><kwd>Д. Трамп</kwd><kwd>Дж.  Байден</kwd><kwd>энергетическая политика</kwd><kwd>сланцевая революция</kwd><kwd>энергетическая независимость</kwd><kwd>энергетическое доминирование</kwd><kwd>сжиженный природный газ</kwd><kwd>возобновляемые источники энергии</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>USA</kwd><kwd>B. Obama</kwd><kwd>D. Trump</kwd><kwd>J.   Biden</kwd><kwd>energy policy</kwd><kwd>shale revolution</kwd><kwd>energy independence</kwd><kwd>energy 	dominance</kwd><kwd>liquefied natural gas</kwd><kwd>renewable energy sources</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Волошин 2018 – Волошин В.И. Энергетическая политика США и сотрудничество Россия–ЕС в нефтегазовом обеспечении // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник. 2018. № 9. С. 58–75.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blackwill,R. and O’Sullivan, M.(2014),“America’s energy edge.The geopolitical consequences of the shale revolution”,Foreign Affairs, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 102–114.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дмитриев 2014 – Дмитриев С.С. Энергетическая стратегия Б. Обамы: опора на инновации и технологическое лидерство. М.: ИМЭМО РАН, 2014. 162 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dmitriev, S.S. (2014), Energeticheskaya strategiya B. Obamy: opora na innovatsii i tekhnologicheskoe liderstvo [Obama’s energy strategy: Relying on innovation and technological leadership], IMEMO RAN, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хлопов 2021 – Хлопов О.А. Итоги энергетической политики администрации Д. Трампа // The Scientific Heritage. 2021. № 61. С. 38–42.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guliyev, F. (2020), “Trump’s ‘America first’ energy policy, contingency, and the reconfiguration of the global energy order”, Energy policy , available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118641/pdf/main.pdf (Accessed 16 December 2023).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blackwill,O’Sullivan2014–Blackwill R., O’Sullivan M.America’senergy edge.The geopolitical consequences of the shale revolution // Foreign Affairs. 2014. No. 2 (93). March – April. P. 102–114.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khlopov, О.А. (2021), “The results of the energy policy under the D. Trump Administration”, The Scientific Heritage, no. 61, pp. 38–42.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guliyev 2020 – Guliyev F. Trump’s “America first” energy policy, contingency, and the reconfiguration of the global energy order // Energy policy. 2020. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7118641/pdf/main.pdf (дата обращения 16.12.2023).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ladislaw, S. (2021), “Lessons from a strategy of energy dominance”, Forum. The geopolitics of energy: out with the old, in with the new? The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, iss. 126, February, pp. 39–41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ladislaw 2021 – Ladislaw S. Lessons from a strategy of energy dominance // Forum. The geopolitics of energy: out with the old, in with the new? The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. 2021. Iss. 126. February. P. 39–41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raphael, S. and Stokes, D. (2014), “US oil strategy in the Caspian Basin: Hegemony through Interdependence”, International Relations , no. 28 (2), pp. 183 – 206.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raphael, Stokes 2014 – Raphael S., Stokes D. US oil strategy in the Caspian Basin: Hegemony through interdependence // International Relations. 2014. No. 2 (28). Р. 183–206.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stiglitz, J. (2018), “Trump and globalization”, Journal of Policy Modelling , vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 515–528.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stiglitz 2018 – Stiglitz J. Trump and globalization // Journal of Policy Modelling. 2018. Vol. 40. No. 3. P. 515–528.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Voloshin, V.I. (2018), “US energy policy and Russia – EU cooperation in oil and gas supply”, Russian Foreign Economic Journal, no. 9, pp. 58–75.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
