politicalscienceВестник РГГУ. Серия “Политология. История. Международные отношения.”RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"2073-6339Издательский центр Российского государственного гуманитарного университета10.28995/2073-6339-2024-5-177-198politicalscience-670Research ArticleОБЩЕСТВЕННО-ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОЦЕССЫ В ПРОШЛОМ И НАСТОЯЩЕМSOCIOPOLITICAL PROCESSES IN THE PAST AND IN THE PRESENTГолоса перемен: женское реформаторство в современном исламеVoices of change. Women’s reformism in modern IslamАлексеевИ. Л.AlekseevI. L.

Игорь Л. Алексеев

125047, Москва, Миусская пл., д. 6

Igor L. Alekseev

6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047

ialxyv@gmail.comСамойловаЕ. Е.SamoilovaE. E.

Елена. Е. Самойлова

125047, Москва, Миусская пл., д. 6

Elena E. Samoilova

6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047

helenaxsam@gmail.comРоссийский государственный гуманитарный университетРоссияRussian State University for the HumanitiesRussian Federation20241512202405177198Copyright © Алексеев И.Л., Самойлова Е.Е., 20242024Алексеев И.Л., Самойлова Е.Е.Alekseev I.L., Samoilova E.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://politicalscience.rsuh.ru/jour/article/view/670

Статья представляет собой анализ женских взглядов в реформистском движении в исламе, стремящемся к переосмыслению традиционных интерпретаций и призывающем к адаптации ислама к современным реалиям. Реформаторское движение в исламе продолжает развиваться и по сей день, обретая и женские голоса. Многие из представительниц этого направления утверждают, что ограничения, наложенные на женщин, не имеют основания в первоисточниках и являются результатом «патриархальных» интерпретаций священных текстов. Эти идеи вызывают дискуссии и споры в мусульманских обществах, поскольку затрагивают фундаментальные вопросы идентичности, традиции и веры. В настоящей статье рассматриваются взгляды женщин–представительниц реформистского движения, как либерально настроенных, так и привержениц консервативного толка, а также отображена динамика их идеологических воззрений. Оба направления чрезвычайно важны для реформистского движения в целом, так как демонстрируют многовекторность развития исламской мысли в этом отношении. Источниками исследования выступают ключевые работы современных деятелей-реформаторов из числа женщин, поскольку выдвигаемые ими идеи в толковании ислама не только заметно увеличились в количественном плане, но и усилились в своем ценностном значении.

The article is an analysis of women’s views in the reformist movement in Islam which seeks to rethink traditional interpretations and calls for the adaptation of Islam to modern realities. The reform movement in Islam continues to develop to the present day gaining women’s voices. Many of representatives in the trend argue that the restrictions imposed on women have   no basis in primary sources and are the result of patriarchal interpretations of sacred texts. Those ideas generate discussions and debate in Muslim societies as they raise fundamental questions of identity, tradition and faith. The article considers views of women representatives in the reformist movement, both liberal-minded and conservative, and also reflects the dynamics of their ideological attitudes. Both directions are extremely important for the reformist movement as a whole as they demonstrate the multi-vector development of Islamic thought in that regard. The sources of the study are the key works of modern female reformers since the ideas they put forward in the interpretation of Islam have not only increased noticeably in quantitative terms but also strengthened in their value significance.

 

мусульманское правометафикхженщиныфеминизмисламИман аль-БадавиреформаторствоIslamic lawmetafiqhwomenfeminismIslamIman al-BadawireformismReferencesАль-Джанаби 2018 – Аль-Джанаби М.М. Суфийский теолого-философский синтез Аль-Газали. М.: Российский университет дружбы народов, 2018. 432 с.Abu-Lughod, L. (2002) “Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others”, American anthropologist, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 783–790.Гасымов 2018 – Гасымов К. Иджтихад в свете целей шариата: Этико-правовая теория Джассера Ауды // Islamology. 2018. № 2. С. 9–28.Ahmed, L. (1992), Women and gender in Islam. Historical roots of a modern debate, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA.Петрушевский 1966 – Петрушевский И.П. Ислам в Иране в VII–XV вв. Л.: Изд-во Ленинградского ун-та, 1966. 398 с.Al-Janabi, M. M. (2018), Sufiiskii teologo-filosofskii sintez Al-Ghazali [Sufi theological and philosophical synthesis of Al-Ghazali], Rossiiskii universitet druzhby narodov, Moscow, Russia.Abu-Lughod 2002 – Abu-Lughod L. Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others // American anthropologist. 2002. Vol. 104. No. 3. P. 783–790.Alloula, M. (1986), The colonial harem, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, USA.Ahmed 1992 – Ahmed L. Women and gender in Islam. Historical roots of a modern de bate. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992. 312 p.Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law. A system approach proach, International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), London, UK, Washington, USA.Alloula 1986 – Alloula M. The colonial harem. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986. 160 p.Barlas, A. (2019), Believing women in Islam. Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qur’an. Revised edition, University of Texas Press, Austin, USA.Auda 2008 – Auda J. Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law. A system approach. L.; Washington: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), 2008. 376 p.Esposito, J.L. and Mogahed, D. (2007), Who speaks for Islam? What a billion Muslims really think, Gallup Press, New York, USA.Barlas 2019 – Barlas A. Believing women in Islam. Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qur’an. Revised edition. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2019. 333 p.Falah, G.-W. (2005), “T The visual representation of Muslim/Arab women in daily newspapers in The United States”, in Fallah, G.-W. and Rose Nagel, C., eds., Geographies of Muslim women. Gender, religion, and space, Guilford Press, New York, USA, pp. 300–320.Esposito, Mogahed 2007 – Esposito J. L., Mogahed D. Who speaks for Islam? What a billion Muslims really think. N.Y.: Gallup Press, 2007. 204 p.Gasymov, K. (2018), “Ijtihad in light of the purposes of Sharia. Ethico-legal theory of Jasser Audy”, Islamology, no. 2, pp. 9–28.Falah 2005 – Falah G.-W. The visual representation of Muslim/Arab women in daily newspapers in The United States // Geographies of Muslim women. Gender, re ligion, and space / ed. by G.-W. Falah, C. Rose Nagel. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 2005. P. 300–320.Gottschalk, P. and Greenberg, G. (2007), Islamophobia. Making Muslims the enemy, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, USA.Gottschalk, Greenberg 2007 – Gottschalk P., Greenberg G. Islamophobia. Making Mus lims the enemy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2007. 192 p.Graham-Brown, S. (1988), Images of women. The portrayal of women in photography of the Middle East, 1860–1950, Columbia University Press, New York, USA.Graham-Brown 1988 – Graham-Brown S. Images of women. The portrayal of women in photography of the Middle East, 1860–1950. N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1988. 288 p.Kynsilehto, A., ed. (2008), Islamic feminism. Current perspectives, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.Kynsilehto 2008 – Islamic feminism. Current perspectives / Ed. by A. Kynsilehto. Tampere: University of Tampere, 2008. 119 p.Mahmood, S. (2006), “Secularism, hermeneutics, and empire. The politics of Islamic reformation”, Public culture, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 323–347.Mahmood 2006 – Mahmood S. Secularism, hermeneutics, and empire. The politics of Islamic reformation // Public culture. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 323–347.Mernissi, F. (1975), Beyond the veil. Male and female dynamics in a modern Muslim society, Schenkmann, Rochester, USA.Mernissi 1975 – Mernissi F. Beyond the veil. Male and female dynamics in a modern Muslim society. Rochester: Schenkmann, 1975. 200 p.Mernissi, F. (1987), Le harem politique: le prophete et les femmes, Albin Michel, Paris, France.Mernissi 1987 – Mernissi F. Le harem politique: le prophete et les femmes. P.: Albin Michel, 1987. 240 p.Mernissi, F. (1990), Sultanes oubliées: femmes chefs d’état en Islam, Le Fennec, Casablanca, Morocco.Mernissi 1990 – Mernissi F. Sultanes oubliées: femmes chefs d’état en Islam. Casablanca: Le Fennec, 1990. 290 p.Mernissi, F. (1994), Dreams of trespass. Tales of a harem girlhood, Addison Wesley Boston, USA.Mernissi 1994 – Mernissi F. Dreams of trespass. Tales of a harem girlhood. Boston: Addison Wesley, 1994. 287 p.Mernissi, F. (2001), Scheherazade goes West: Different Cultures, Different Harems, Le Fennec, Casablanca, Morocco.Mernissi 2001 – Mernissi F. Scheherazade goes West: Different Cultures, Different Harems. Casablanca: Le Fennec, 2001. 240 p.Petrushevskii, I.P. (1966), Islam v Irane v VII–XV vv. [Islam in Iran in 7 th – 15th centuries], Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, Leningrad, USSR.Shaikh 2003 – Shaikh S. Transforming feminisms. Islam, women and gender justice // Progressive Muslims. On justice, gender and pluralism / Ed. by O. Safi. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2003. P. 147–162.Shaikh, S. (2003), “Transforming feminisms. Islam, women and gender justice”, in Safi, O., ed., Progressive Muslims. On justice, gender and pluralism, Oneworld Publications, Oxford, UK, pp. 147–162.Spivak 1994 – Spivak G.Ch. Can the subaltern speak? // Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory / Ed. by P. Williams, L. Chrisman. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994. P. 66–111.Spivak, G.Ch. (1994), “Can the subaltern speak?”, in Williams, P. and Chrisman, L., eds., Colonial discourse and postcolonial theory, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, UK, pp. 66–111.Wadud 1995–1996 – Wadud A. Towards Qur’anic hermeneutics of social justice. Race, class and gender // Journal of law and religion. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 37–50.Wadud, A. (1995–1996), “Towards Qur’anic hermeneutics of social justice. Race, class and gender”, Journal of law and religion, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–50.Wadud 1999 – Wadud A. Qurʼan and woman. Rereading the Sacred Text from a woman’s perspective. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1999. 118 p.Wadud, A. (1999), Qurʼan and woman. Rereading the Sacred Text from a woman’s perspective, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.Wadud 2006 – Wadud A. Inside the gender jihad. Women’s reform in Islam. L.: One world Publications, 2006. 325 p.Wadud, A. (2006), Inside the gender jihad. Women’s reform in Islam, Oneworld Publications, London, UK.Wadud 2022 – Wadud A. Once in a lifetime. Oldham: Kantara Press, 2022. 182 p.Wadud, A. (2022), Once in a lifetime, Kantara Press, Oldham, UK.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.