De-facto States: the Post-Soviet Political Phenomenon
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-1-24-40
Abstract
About the Author
S. M. MarkedonovRussian Federation
Sergey M. Markedonov, PhD in History, associate professor
bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Lynch D. Separatist States and Post-Soviet Conflicts. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs). 2002;4(78):831-48.
2. Markelova AA. Secession as a Political Phenomenon. Sotsium i vlast’. 2017;3(65):52-3. (In Russ).
3. De Waal T. Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Trough Peace and War. New York; London: New York Univ. Press Publ.; 2003. 358 p.
4. Pegg S. International Society and the De Facto State. Aldershot: Ashgate Publ.; 1998. 308 p.
5. Kolstø P., Malgin A. The Transnistrian Republic: A Case of Politicized Regionalism. Nationalities Papers. 1998;1(26):103-28.
6. Meron R. After Empire: Russia and the Southern Near Abroad. V: The New Russian Foreign Policy. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press Publ.; 1988. P. 220–232.
7. Cornell SE. Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective. World Politics. 2002;2:245-76.
8. Lynch D. Engaging Eurasia’s Separatist States: Unresolved Conflicts and De Facto States. Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press Publ.; 2004. 175 p.
9. Broers L. The Politics of Non-Recognition and Democratization. V: Broers L, ed. Accord: An International Review of Peace Initiatives: The Limits of Leadership: Elites and Societies in the Nagorny Karabakh Peace Process. 2005;17:68–71.
10. Kupchan C. Independence for Kosovo. Foreign Affairs. 2005;6(84):152-60.
11. Tamás G. Ethnarchy and Ethno-Anarchism. Social Research. 1996;63(1):147-90.
12. King C. The Benefits of Ethnic War: Understanding Eurasia’s Unrecognized States. World Politics. 2001;3:524-52.
13. Kolstø P. The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States’. Journal of Peace Research. 2006;6(43):723-40.
14. Ó Beacháin D. Electoral Politics in Abkhazia. Paper presented at the conference “After the Melting of Frozen Conflicts”, University of Tartu, Estonia, May 27-29, 2010. [Manuscript.]
15. Ó Beacháin D. The dynamics of electoral politics in Abkhazia. Communist and PostCommunist Studies. 2012;45:165-74.
16. Blakkisrud H., Kolstø P. Dynamics of de facto statehood: The South Caucasian de facto states between secession and sovereignty. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2012;2(12):281-98.
17. Caspersen N. Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System. Cambridge: Polity Publ.; 2012. 210 p.
18. Markedonov S., Tekushev I., Shevchenko K., eds. Abkhazia: Between the Past and the Future. Prague: Medium orient Publ.; 2013. 134 p.
19. Kudelia S. Domestic Sources of the Donbas Insurgency [Internet]. PONARS Eurasia. 2014. Sept. (data obrashcheniya: 23 dec. 2017). URL: http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/domestic-sources-donbas-insurgency
20. Umland A. In Defense of Conspirology: A Rejoinder to Serhiy Kudelia’s Anti-Political Analysis of the Hybrid War in Eastern Ukraine [Internet]. PONARS Eurasia. 2014. Sept 30. (data obrashcheniya 23 dec. 2017). URL: http://www.ponarseurasia.org/node/7274
21. United Nations organization. on membership [Internet]. (data obrashcheniya: 3 nov. 2017). URL: http://www.un.org/ru/sections/member-states/about-unmembership/index.html (In Russ.)
22. Convention on Rights and Duties of States (inter-American), December 26, 1933. Lillian Goldman Law Library [Internet]. (data obrashcheniya: 25 jan. 2017). URL: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/intam03.asp
23. Brownlie I. Principles of Public International Law. 5th ed. oxford: oxford Univ. Press Publ.; 1998. 784 p.
24. Shaw M. International Law. 4th ed. Grotius Publication, Cambridge Univ. Press Publ.; 1997. 449 p.
25. Trifunovska S., ed. Yugoslavia through Documents. From Its Creation to Its Dissolution. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 1996. 1346 p.
26. King C. The Ghost оf Fгееdоm. А History of the Caucasus. oxford Univ. Press Publ.; 2008. 314 p.
27. Nolte G. Principles of International Law: Self-Determination and Territorial Integrity – as Applied to the Cases of Abkhazia, Kosovo and South ossetia. Conflict in Post-Soviet Europe. The South Caucasus: Are there Scenarios for Resolution? Berlin: Federal Foreign office, Foreign Service Academy Publ.; 2009. 206 p.
28. Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict on Georgia. [Internet]. (data obrashcheniya 17 dec. 2017). URL: https://ru.scribd.com/document/20427542/Tagliavini-Report-Georgia-Volume-I
29. Troebst S. “We Are Transnistrians!” Post-Soviet Identity Management in the Dniester Valley. Ab Imperio. 2003;1:437-66.
30. Tsutsiyev AA. Territories of problematic sovereignty. V: Papers of the Institute of Eastern Europe. Moscow, 2006. Issue 1. p. 19-35 (In Russ.)
31. Yannis A. The Concept of Suspended Sovereignty in International Law and Its Implications in International Politics. European Journal of International Law. 2002;13:13-35.
32. Lapidus GW. Contested Sovereignty: The Tragedy of Chechnya. International Security. 1998;1(23), Summer:5-49.
Review
For citations:
Markedonov S.M. De-facto States: the Post-Soviet Political Phenomenon. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2018;(1):24-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-1-24-40