Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"

Advanced search

“New Democracies” under Conditions of Economic Globalization. Problems and Perspectives of Development

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-2-21-38

Abstract

The article deals with the analysis of the impact of economic globalization on the progress of democratization “third wave” democratization. Basing on the economic and political statistics data the author makes attempt to reveal the nature of the impact of the liberalization of commodity, financial and industrial interactions within the global economic system on the level of culturally-based demand for political freedom as well as the level of its institutional offer in the countries of the “new democracy”.

The article focuses on the ambivalent effect which the process of involvement of the societies undergoing democratization into the global division have on their political culture. on the one hand, economic globalization, on the one hand, encourages spreading in mass conscience of secular and rational values that are manifested in the expansion of political participation. on the other hand, the majority of “the third wave” countries are held within the periphery and semi-periphery of the world economy. This situation contributed to preserving in their mass culture prevalence of survival values, shaping a limited demand for political freedom.

The author concludes that increasing competition in global markets makes the governments to cut down social expenses what in its turn provokes mass protest and lead the ruling elites of new democratic states to choosing a policy of limited institutional offer of political freedom. And this kind of policy means moving towards non-liberal form of democracy. 

About the Author

S. L. Chepel
Russian State University for the Humanities; Finance University.
Russian Federation

PhD in History, associate professor.

 bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993;  bld. 49, Leningradsky av., Moscow, 125993.



References

1. Freedom in the World. Country Ratings – Freedom House [Internet]. [data obrashcheniya 25 Feb. 2018]. URL: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2015/table-country-ratings

2. Gwartney J., Lawson R., Block W. Economic Freedom of the World: 1975–1995 [Internet]. P. 82. [data obrashcheniya 4 Mar. 2018]. URL: www.unctad.org/en/ Docs/wir1995_en.pdf

3. World Investment Report 1995. Transnational corporations and competitiveness [Internet]. P. 14. [data obrashcheniya 4 Mar. 2018]. URL: www.unctad.org/en/ Docs/wir1995_en.pdf

4. Giddens A. Runaway world. How globalization is reshaping our lives. Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ.; 2004. 116 p. (In Russ.)

5. Schmitter Ph. More Liberal. Preliberal or Postliberal? [data obrashcheniya 18 Mar. 2018]. URL: http://www.russ.ru/journal/predely/97-10-28/shmitter.htm

6. Inglehart R., Welzel Ch. Modernization, cultural change and democracy. The human development sequence. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo Publ.; 2011. 464 p. (In Russ.)

7. Lipset S. Political man. The social bases of political life. V: Dal’ RA., Shapiro I., Cheibub JA., comp. Theory and practice of democracy. Selected texts. Moscow: Ladomir Publ.; 2006. p. 46-53. (In Russ.)

8. Linz J., Stepan A. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. London: The Johns Hopkins Press Ltd., 1996. 479 p.

9. Przeworski A., Alvarez M., Cheibub JA., Limongi F. Economic development and political regimes. V: Dal’ RA., Shapiro I., Cheibub JA., comp. Theory and practice of democracy. Selected texts. Moscow: Ladomir Publ.; 2006. 496 p. (In Russ.)

10. Shaohua Chen, Ravallion M. How Have the World’s Poorest Fared Since the Early 1980s? Development Research Group. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2004. P. 28 [Internet]. [data obrashcheniya 11 Mar. 2018] URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar. org/e870/90db178cbf7f3787d2ffb165b1c3a024d380.pdf

11. Rodrik D. The globalization paradox. Democracy and the future of the world economy. Moscow: Institut Gaidara Publ.; 2014. 576 p. (In Russ.)

12. Held D., Goldblatt D., McGrew A., Perraton J. Global transformations. Politics, economics and culture. Moscow: Praksis Publ.; 2004. 576 p. (In Russ.)

13. Laidi Z. Mondialisation et democratie. Politique étrangère. [Internet]. 2001. [data obrashcheniya 25 Mar. 2018]; 3. p. 603-18. URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ polit_0032-342x_2001_num_66_3_5101

14. Huntington S. The third wave. Democratization in the late twentieth century. Moscow: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (RoSSPEN) Publ.; 1991. 368 p. (In Russ.)

15. Eichengreen B. Democratie et mondialisation: la poule et l’oeuf. Telos. [Internet]. 2006 [data obrashcheniya 25 Mar. 2018 ]; Sept. 15. URL: https://www.telos-eu. com/fr/globalisation/politique-internationale/democratie-et-mondialisation-lapoule-et-luf.html

16. World Investment Report 1997. Transnational corporations, market structure and competition policy [Internet]. [data obrashcheniya 4 Mar. 2018]:28,34. URL: www. unctad.org/en/Docs/wir1997_en.pdf

17. Beck U. What is globalization? Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ.; 2001. 304 p. (In Russ.)

18. o’Donnell G. Do economists know best? Journal of Democracy [Internet]. 1995 [data obrashcheniya 18 Mar. 2018 ];1. URL: http://old.russ.ru/journal/predely/97-11-11/o_donn.htm


Review

For citations:


Chepel S.L. “New Democracies” under Conditions of Economic Globalization. Problems and Perspectives of Development. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2018;(2):21-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-2-21-38

Views: 571


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6339 (Print)