Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"

Advanced search

Religious and political conflict in Ukraine in the context of Russian projects of “soft power” in 1990–2017

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-2-79-91

Abstract

The article attempts to consider the religious and political conflict in Ukraine in the context of exercising the Russian “soft power” having been applied in the period of 1990–2017. The author analyzes the formats and strategies of the Russian “soft power” in Ukraine using means and potentialities of the Russian orthodox Church (RoC) and the Ukrainian orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (UoC MP). The elements of Russian soft power with the use of the religious factor are fixed within the election companies of the Ukrainian President The author also analyzes the influence of the religious factor while forming and later articulating the “Russian world” conception as a tool of Russian soft power. He demonstrates an evolution of the “Russian world” discourse produced by the RoC and RoC MP from “integration” aimed at transforming the political reality to “protective” aimed at preserving the spiritual tradition and identifies four stages of the evolution of the Russian soft power in Ukraine with the use of the religious factor. The author concludes that there is no global project to implement the Russian soft power in Ukraine using the religious factor but there are some local situational projects that represent a response to a specific political challenge.

About the Author

S. P. Dontsev
Russian State University for the Humanities.
Russian Federation

Ph.D. in Politics.

 bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993.



References

1. Petrushko VI. on attempts of establishing the Kiev Patriarchate of by the Ukrainian Uniates and Schismatics-autocephalists in the twentieth century. Moscow: Pravoslavnyi Svyato-Tikhonovskii gumanitarnyi universitet Publ.; 2008. 407 p. (In Russ.)

2. Dontsev SP. Russian orthodox Church and the State on the Cusp of the 19th and 20th Centuries. Issues of Intercommunion. Moscow: RGGU Publ.; 2014. 230 p. (In Russ.)

3. Kazantsev AA., Merkushev VN. Russia and post-Soviet space. Prospects for the use of “soft power”. Polis. 2008;2:122-35. (In Russ.)

4. Filimonov GY. Topical issues of forming a strategy of “soft power” in the foreign policy of the Russian Federation. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2014;1:104-7. (In Russ.)

5. Dontsev SP. Confessional factor in the design of the “Russian World”. Political design in the space of social communications. Proceedings of the XI International Scientific Conference. Moscow: Mir filosofii Publ.; 2016. p. 134-41. (In Russ.)

6. Bocharov AV. Soft power potential in the political concept of “Russian world”. Background and prospects of research. Diskurs-Pi. 2014;2-3:85-91. (In Russ.)

7. Borisova EG. Soft power as a modern instrument of power (Preface of the compiler). V: Borisova EG., ed. Soft power Soft rule. Interdisciplinary analysis. Moscow: Flinta, Publ.; Nauka Publ.; 2015. 230 p. (In Russ.)

8. Foreign policy concept of the Russian Federation. Approved by the President of the Russian Federation V. Putin on 12 February 2013. Garant-ru: legal information portal [Internet]. [data obrashcheniya 20 Feb. 2018]. URL: http://www.garant.ru/ products/ipo/prime/doc/70218094/ (In Russ.)

9. Patriarch Filaret: “Russia pushes Ukraine onto the Belarusian path.” An interview of Patriarch Filaret to the correspondent of the “Novye Izvestia” newspaper, E. Komarov. Novye Izvestia. 2001. June 19:3. (In Russ.)

10. Patriarch Alexiy and Leonid Kuchma discussed the status of the Ukrainian orthodox Church [Internet]. Information agency “Russian Line” Nov. 30. 2001 г. [data obrashcheniya 20 Feb. 2018]. URL: http://rusk.ru/newsdata.php?idar=373 (In Russ.)

11. Kuraev A. Ukraine makes a choice. Tserkovnyi vestnik [Internet]. 2004 [data obrashcheniya 20 Feb. 2018]; (24). URL: http://www.interfax-religion.ru/?act= print&div=64 (In Russ.)

12. Metropolitan Kirill urged Ukrainian politicians not to involve the orthodox Church in the political struggle. Interfax-Religion [Internet]. 2005. Nov. 16. [data obrashcheniya 20 Feb. 2018]. URL: www.interfax-religion.ru/?act=news&div=7559 (In Russ.)

13. Lavrov SV. The foreign policy philosophy of Russia. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’. 2013;3:1-8. (In Russ.)

14. The Council calls the unity of the Holy Rus ‘ “greatest asset” of the peoples of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. Interfax-Religion [Internet]. 2008. June 27. [data obrashcheniya 20 Feb. 2018]. URL: www.interfax-religion.ru/orthodoxy/ ?act=news&div=25181 (In Russ.)

15. Determination of The Consecrated Bishops ‘Council of the Russian orthodox Church “on unity of the Church”. Official website of the Moscow Patriarchate [Internet]. 2008. June 27. [data obrashcheniya 20 Feb. 2018]. URL: www.patriarchia.ru/ db/text/428916.html (In Russ.)

16. Patriarch Kirill calls on the countries of the Russian world to become centers of a single powerful civilization. Interfax-Religion [Internet]. 2010. Nov. 3. [data obrashcheniya 20 Feb. 2018]. URL: www.interfax-religion.ru/orthodoxy/?act= news&div=38063 (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Dontsev S.P. Religious and political conflict in Ukraine in the context of Russian projects of “soft power” in 1990–2017. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2018;(2):79-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-2-79-91

Views: 576


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6339 (Print)