On the constitutive transit in media phenomena: investigations for political studies
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-4-9-23
Abstract
The author specifies the interpretation of the media phenomenon. Medium phenomenon and communication are described as the background and the supportive framework for social and political processes. Medium precedes communication. For understanding media phenomena constitutive role of the medium is more meaningful than its transmission functioning in social life. The constitutive potential of the medium determines the very essential sense of the famous thesis “The Medium is the Message”. It is even more clear following the cross-cultural interpretations of this thesis in English and Russian languages.
Constitutive understanding of the medium phenomena influences the treatments of the political processes. The medium messes, mixes the certain place of reality and as if it lights up social spaces. According to this metaphor, the phenomenon of policy also forms the ontological locus where through the processing of informational uncertainty one can establish commonly shared values and norms for social consolidation and activities. The author characterizes the policy medium patterns proceeding from the unstable (E. Laclau, C. Mouffe) and object-oriented (G. Harman) ontology.
About the Author
S. V. Klyagin
Russian State University for the Humanities;
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Klyagin, Dr. in Philosophy, professor
bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, Russia, 125993;
bld.49, Leningradski av., Moscow, Russia, 125993
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Klyagin, Dr. in Philosophy, professor
bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, Russia, 125993;
bld.49, Leningradski av., Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Giddens A. Runaway World. Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ.; 2004. 120 p. (In Russ.)
2. Bauman Z. Globalization: The Human Consequences. Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ.; 2004. 188 p. (In Russ.)
3. Apel К-О. Communicative community as a transcendental premise of social studies. V: Apel К.-О. Transformation of the Philosophy. Moscow: Logos Publ.; 2004. p. 193-236. (In Russ.)
4. Joas H. Creativeness of Action. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteia Publ.; 2005. 320 S. (In Russ.)
5. Habermas J. Democracy. Mind. Moral. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1992. 175 p. (In Russ.)
6. Luhnam N. Medium of the Communication. Moscow: Logos Publ.; 2005. 280 p. (In Russ.)
7. Debray R. Introdution into the medialogy. Moscow: Praksis Publ.; 2009. 368 p. (In Russ.)
8. Kirillova N. Mediology as the Synthesis of Sciences. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ.; 2013. 366 p. (In Russ.)
9. Klyagin SV. A Man as the medium in the Political Space Dynamics. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series “Political Science. History. International Relations. International relations. Area Oriental Studies”. 2015;6:13-25. (In Russ.)
10. Klyukanov I. The Communicative Universe. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ.; 2010. 256 p. (In Russ.)
11. Klyukanov I. Message and Forgetting. Moscow; Sankt-Peterburg: Tsentr gumani-tarnykh initsiativ Publ.; 2018. 286 p. (In Russ.)
12. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Moscow: URSS Publ.; 2001. 256 p. (In Russ.)
13. McLuhan M. Understanding media. External Human Extensions. Moscow: KANON-press-Ts Publ.; 2003. 464 p. (In Russ.)
14. McLuhan M. Understanding Media, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964. 359 p.
15. McLuhan M., Fiore Q. The Medium is the Massage. Harmondsworth: Penguin, Penguin Books, 1967. 406 p.
16. Chubarov I. Media. Media Scince and Media Philosophy. Logos. 2015;2:92-105. (In Russ.)
17. Online Etymology Dictionary [Internet]. [data obrashcheniya 16 Nov. 2018]. URL: www.etymonline.com
18. Morris W., ed. The American heritage dictionary of the English language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; New college edition, 1986. 1550 p.
19. Fuller M. Media Ecologies. Materialist Energies in Art and Technologies. London. MIT Press, 2007. 265 p.
20. Kittler F. Discourse Networks, 1800/1900. Stanford University Press, 1990. 459 p.
21. Sensorium Journal. Vol. 1 [Internet]. [data obrashcheniya 16 Nov. 2018]. URL: https://liu.se/sensorium/a-medium-is-a-medium-is-a-medium-2/
22. Golik NV., Zaitsev IN., Koshmilo OK. ets., eds. Emmanyuel’ Levinas: The Way to the Other. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Publ.; 2006. 236 p. (In Russ.)
23. Ranciere J. At the boundary of the politic. Moscow: Praksis Publ.; 2006. 240 p. (In Russ.)
24. Zherebkin S. Unstable Ontologies in the Modern Philosophy. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteiya Publ.; 2013. 349 p. (In Russ.)
25. Zizek S. The instruments for social gaps. The Parallacs Vision. Мoscow: Evropa Publ.; 2008. 516 p. (In Russ.)
26. Urry J. Sociology beyond societies. Mobility types for the 21st century Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki Publ.; 2012. 336 p. (In Russ.)
27. Harman G. Immaterialism. Objects and Social Theory. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Insti-tuta Gaidara Publ.; 2018. 153 p. (In Russ.)
28. Klyagin SV., Shipunova OD, eds. Philosophy of Communication. Theoretical and Methodological Aspects.Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel’stvo Politekhnicheskogo univer-siteta Publ.; 2017. 272 p. (In Russ.)
29. Gavra DP. Fundamentals of Communication Theory. A Textbook for Academic Baccalaureate. Moscow: Yurait Publ.; 2016. p. 262-73. (In Russ.)
30. Logunov AP., ed. The modern communication studies. Social practices as word consistency. Moscow: URSS Publ.; 2014. 197 p. (In Russ.)
31. Logunov AP., ed. Political Projecting in the Social Communication Space: Proceedings of the XI International Conference. Moscow, RGGU/RSUH, October 26, 2016. Moscow: Mir filosofii Publ.; 2016. 477 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Klyagin S.V. On the constitutive transit in media phenomena: investigations for political studies. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2018;(4):9-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-4-9-23
Views:
396
Email this article 