Аntique matrix of modern latent barbarity
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-4-65-81
Abstract
As a subject of analysis, the article proposes a research model for the study of the modern barbarity. The Greek-Latin narrative tradition of barbarians is presented as the antique matrix of barbarity, which creates an image of the barbarian in action, dynamics, quality and integrative characteristics.
The attention is drawn to the possibility of using the antique matrix of perception and understanding of barbarity in the study of the modern “new barbarity”. In this regard, the author highlights issues of the prerequisites and peculiarities of the manifestation of “new barbarity” manifestation in the dynamics of modern civilizational processes. She also considers the forms of “new barbarity” (intellectual, aesthetic, barbarization of worldview), that emerged in the Postmodern era.
For the first time the latent barbarity is accentuated as an independent historical phenomenon, which is defined as the special form of existence of barbarity within civilization. The scientific novelty is the first formulated historical and terminological characteristics of the nature of the latent barbarity (hidden and being hidden) as a way of social barbarism.
In the course of analysis, the author denotes the birth conditions forms of manifestation and spheres of influence of latent barbarity inside civilization. She is the first to demonstrate its danger place in social history.
About the Author
V. P. BudanovaRussian Federation
Vera P. Budanova, Dr. in History, professor
bld. 32A, Leninsky av., Moscow, 119334
References
1. Taylor EB. Primitive Culture. Moscow: Politizdat Publ.; 1989. 568 p. (In Russ.)
2. Morgan LH. Ancient Society. Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilisation. Moscow: Editoriya URSS Publ.; 2016. 360 p. (In Russ.)
3. Engels F. The Origin of the Family, the Private Property and the State. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury Publ.; 1980. 382 p. (In Russ.)
4. Gurevich PS. Classical and Non-classical Anthropology. The Comparative Analysis. Moscow; Sankt-Peterburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ.; Petroglif Publ.; 2018. 496 p. (In Russ.)
5. Ammianus Marcellinus. Rerum gestarum libri qui supersunt. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1992. 656 S.
6. Baron Robert A., Richardson Deborah R. Human Aggression. 2nd edition. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter Publ.; 2017. 416 p. (In Russ.)
7. Budanova VP. Barbarians and Barbarity in the Anthropology of Civilizations. V; Budanova VP., Vorob’eva OV., eds. Civilization and barbarity. Concepts transformation and regional experience. Moscow: Institut vseobshchei istorii RAN Publ.; 2012. Iss. 1. p. 10-46. (In Russ.)
8. Budanova VP. Barbarian World of Peoples Great Migration Epoch. Moscow: Nau-ka Publ.; 2000. 544 p. (In Russ.)
9. Goffart W. Rome’s Final Conquest: The Barbarians. History Compass. 2008;3:855-83.
10. Wolfram H. Geschichte der Goten. München: Beck, 1980. 495 S.
11. Goffart WA. Barbarians and Romans. A.D. 418–584. The Techniques of Accommodation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980. 278 p.
12. Dauge YA. Le Barbare. Recherches sur la conception romaine de la barbarie et de la civilization. Bruxelles: Collection Latomus, 1981. 859 p.
13. Miller MM., Soeffner H-G., Hrsg. Modernität und Barbarei. Soziologische Zeitdiag-nose am Ende des 20 Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1996. 370 S.
14. Leguay JP. L’Europe des États barbares V–VIII siècles. Paris: Belin, 2002. 384 p.
15. Kurbanov MG. The Barbarity in the Grimaces of Civilization. Vestnik Rossiiskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2006;2:120-22. (In Russ.)
16. Barbero A. Barbarés. Immigres, réfugiés et déportés dans l´Empire romain. Paris: Tallandier, 2011. 352 p.
17. Motroshilova NV. Civilization and Barbarity in the Era of Global Crises. Moscow: IFRAN, Kanon+ ROOI “Reabilitatsiya” Publ.; 2010. 480 p. (In Russ.)
18. Castells M. The Informational Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Moscow: GU VShE Publ.; 2000. 608 p. (In Russ.)
19. Ivanov DV. Virtualization of Society. Version 2.0. Sankt-Peterburg: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie Publ.; 2002. 224 p. (In Russ.)
20. Huntington SP. The Clash of Civilizations. Moscow: AST Publ.; 2006. 571 p. (In Russ.)
21. Khrenov NA. The Experience of the Culturological Interpretation of Transitive Processes. V: Khrenov NA., ed. Art in a situation of changing cycles. Interdisciplinary studies of artistic culture in transitional processes. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 2002. p. 11-55. (In Russ.)
22. Yakovenko IG. Transitive Epochs and Eschatoligical Aspects of Traditional Mentality. V: Khrenov NA., ed. Art in a situation of changing cycles. Interdisciplinary studies of artistic culture in transitional processes. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 2002. p. 136-47. (In Russ.)
23. Bell D. The Coming Post-Industrial Society. A Venture in Social Forecasting. Мoscow: Academia Publ.; 2004. 788 p. (In Russ.)
24. Budanova VP., Vorob’eva OV., eds. Civilization and Barbarism. Concepts Transformation and Regional Experience. Moscow: Institut vseobshchei istorii RAN Publ.; 2012. Iss. 1. 351 p. (In Russ.)
25. Pelipenko AA. Postmodernism in the Context of Transitive Processes. V: Khrenov NA., ed. Art in a situation of changing cycles. Interdisciplinary studies of artistic culture in transitional processes. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 2002. p. 383-98. (In Russ.)
26. Budanov AV. Postmodern and Barbarity. V: Budanova VP., Vorob’eva OV., eds. Civilization and barbarism. Paradoxes of the victory of civilization over barbarity. Moscow: Institut vseobshchei istorii RAN Publ.; 2013. Iss. 2. p. 379-400. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Budanova V.P. Аntique matrix of modern latent barbarity. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2018;(4):65-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-4-65-81