The “critical” version of the Russian historical events at the beginning of twentieth century in the modern native historiography
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2019-2-24-34
Abstract
In the article an attempt is made to study works of the modern Russian historians published in the process of preparing and holding the 100th anniversary of the Great Russian Revolution of 1917. The focus of the article is on clarifying the concept of a “critical” version of modern historiography as a revision of relevant ideas about historical events in Russia at the beginning of the twentieth century, which traditionally existed in Soviet historiography. The author of the article aims to identify the theoretical and methodological as well as the factual basis for reconstructing the historical events of the early twentieth century in the texts of renown modern Russian historians. She concentrates her attention on the question of increment of scientific knowledge in historiographical sources selected for a historiographical analysis. To that end, the article investigates the justification and productivity of using the intellectual instrumentarium of the new political history and psychological history to solve the questions formulated by the authors of analyzed historiographical sources. It is the author's opinion that the “critical” version of the modern historiography is outlining the productive approaches to redefining the meanings of Russian historical events of the early twentieth century. So far that is only the initial intellectual drawing of the new theoretical and methodological mechanisms in the modern historiography, but it is obvious, that with all the apparent provocativeness of the proposed approaches, it is a necessary step to create a new image of the past in response to the challenges of our time.
About the Author
N. V. IlleritskayaRussian Federation
Natalia V. Illeritskaya, Doctor of Sciences (History), professor, bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Solovʼev K. The Lord of the Russian Land? Autocracy and Bureaucracy in the Era of Modernism. Kirill Soloviev. The Basic Trends and Achievements in Studying the Issue. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2017. 296 p.[In Russ.]
2. Porshneva O. A man in situation of the Great Russian revolution of 1917 // 1917 in Russia. Socialist Idea, Revolutionary Mythology and Practice. Coll. scient. Works. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta Publ.; 2016. 382 p. [In Russ.]
3. Buldakov V. The Great Revolution of 1917 year. The myths we choose. Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: History. 2017;1:39-62. [In Russ.]
4. Linchenko A. History as a Factor of Demythologization of Historical Culture. Philosophical and Methodological Aspect. V: Professional Historiography and Historical Memory: An Experience of Intersection and Interaction in a Comparative Historical Perspective. Coll. of articles. Institute of General History of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow: Akvilon Publ.; 2017. 256 p. [In Russ.]
5. Buldakov V. The First World War, European Culture and Russian Riot. Towards Reinterpretation of the Events of 1917 V: The Great Russian Revolution, 1917. A Hundred Years of Study [Text]. Proceedings of International. Scientific Conf. (Moscow, October 9–11, 2017) / Ex. ed. Yu.A. Petrov. Moscow: IRI(IRH) RAN Publ.; 2017. 808 p. [In Russ.]
Review
For citations:
Illeritskaya N.V. The “critical” version of the Russian historical events at the beginning of twentieth century in the modern native historiography. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2019;(2):24-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2019-2-24-34