Karl A. Wittfogel and the formation of the concept of hydraulic state in Mesoamerica
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2020-4-144-155
Abstract
The article describes the evolution of the ideas about the of social and economic nature and political structure of pre-Columbian societies of Mesoamerica of the founder of the theory of “hydraulic society” Karl Wittfogel (1896-1988). An analysis of Wittfogel’s early publications shows that he initially attributed Mesoamerica to the type of oriental “feudal” societies that did not develop a despotic-type state. The change of this position was connected to the contacts with the Mesoamericanists like Paul Kirchhoff and Pedro Carrasco and cooperation with Julian Steward. Wittfogel’s theoretical ideas had an important impact on the position of Angel Palerm, who formulated his own concept of the emergence of urban civilization in Mesoamerica. The work of Palerm and Pedro Armillas, in their turn, contributed to the final formulation of Wittfogel’s views of the pre-Hispanic history. In “Oriental Despotism” (1957), Wittfogel suggested that civilization in Mesoamerica was based on hydraulic system and separated two regional variants. The first, defined as semi-complex (“loose”) hydraulic society (subtype L2), includes the states of Central Mexico (Aztec and Texcoco). The second called “marginal hydraulic societies substantial hydraulic elements” (subtype M1) was represented by the lowland Maya.
About the Author
D. Beliaev
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitri Beliaev - Cand. of Sci. (History), associate professor.
Bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Adams, R.M. (1960), “Early Civilizations, Subsistence, and Environment”, in Krae-ling, C.H., Adams, R.M. (eds.), City Invincible, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 269-296.
2. Adams, R.M. (1966), The Evolution of Urban Society: Early Mesopotamia and Prehispanic Mexico, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, IL, USA.
3. Eisenstadt, S.N. (1958), “The study of oriental despotisms as systems of total power”, Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 435-446.
4. Ivanov, N.A. (ed.) (1993), Fenomen vostochogo despotizma: struktura upravleniya i vlasti [The phenomenon of the oriental despotism. The governance and power structure], Nauka,Vostochnaya literatura. Moscow, Russia.
5. Latov, Yu.V. (2007), “‘Oriental Despotism’ by K.A. Wittfogel. On the 50-anniversary of a ‘strange’ book”, Istoriko-ehkonomicheskie issledovaniya, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 8-37.
6. Leach, E. (1959), “Hydraulic Society in Ceylon”, Past and Present, vol. 15, pp. 2-26.
7. Nikiforov, V.N. (1977), Vostok i vsemirnaya istoriya [Orient and the world history], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
8. Pavlovskaya, A.I. (1965), O kontseptsii gidravlicheskogo obshchestva K. Vitfogelya [On the concept of hydraulic society by K. Wittfogel], Vestnik drevnei istorii, no. 4, pp. 184-190.
9. Palerm, A. (1952), “La civilization urbana”, Historia Mexicana, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 184-209.
10. Palerm, A. (1958), “Review of ‘Oriental despotism: a comparative study of total power’ by Karl A. Wittfogel”, American Antiquity, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 440-441.
11. Pikov, G.G. (2010), “Karl August Wittfogel and ‘oriental despotism’”, in Repina, L.P. (ed.), Istoriya cherez lichnost’. Istoricheskaya biografiya segodnya [History through personality. Historical biography today], Kvadriga, Moscow, Russia, pp. 390-412.
12. Price, B. (1971), “Prehispanic Irrigation Agriculture in Nuclear America”, Latin American Research Review, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 3-60.
13. Pulleyblank, E.G. (1958), “Review of ‘Oriental despotism: a comparative study of total power’ by Karl A. Wittfogel”, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 351-353.
14. Steward J. (1949), “Cultural Causality and Law: A Trial Formulation of the Development of Early Civilizations”, American Anthropologist, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1-27.
15. Toynbee, A. (1958), “Oriental Despotism, a Comparative Study of Total Power. By Karl A. Wittfogel”, American Political Science Review, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 195-198.
16. Wittfogel, K.A. (1938), “Die Theorie der orientalischen Gesellschaft”, Zeitschrift fur Sozialforschung, vol. 7, hft. 1/2, S. 90-122.
17. Wittfogel, K.A. (1955), “Developmental Aspects of Hydraulic Societies”, in Steward, J. (ed.), Irrigation Civilizations: A Comparative Study, Pan American Union, Washington, pp. 43-57.
18. Wittfogel, K.A. (1957), Oriental Despotism, a Comparative Study of Total Power, Yale University Press, New Haven; London.
19. Wittfogel, K.A. (1972), “The hydraulic approach to Pre-Spanish Mesoamerica”, in Johnson, F. (ed.), The prehistory of the Tehuacan valley. Vol. 4. Chronology and irrigation, University of Texas Press, Austin & London, pp. 59-80.
20. Wolf, E. (1981), Angel Palerm Wich 1917-1980, American Anthropologist, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 612-615.
Review
For citations:
Beliaev D. Karl A. Wittfogel and the formation of the concept of hydraulic state in Mesoamerica. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2020;(4/2):144-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2020-4-144-155
Views:
347
Email this article 