P.M. Golovachev. The Far East in the thoughts of the historian
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2021-1-50-61
Abstract
The author of the article makes an attempt to analyze the views of Russian historian Peter Mikhailovich Golovachev. Those views concerned issues of Russian policy in the Far East in the late 19th – early 20th century. The basis of the article is analyzing P.M. Golovachev’s treatise “Russia in the Far East”. The author of the article intends not only to research different aspects of Russian Far Eastern policy raised in that treatise. The analysis of intellectual context has an equal significance. The author makes an attempt to represent specific features of Russian public thought at the turn of the ages. Researching of P.M. Golovachev’s views enables to identify several intellectual transformations concerned Russian society’s visions of the Far East. The author of the article emphasizes that historical knowledge allowed P.M. Golovachev having an unconventional approach to the consideration of issues of interest to the Russian public. The latter was expressed, in particular, in criticism of well-established ideas and concepts. The author concludes arguing that P.M. Golovachev’s work was the great example of the Far East development project. The emergence of such projects became the forerunner of the sphere of knowledge, which later became known as “geopolitics”.
About the Author
К. А. MedvedevRussian Federation
Konstantin A. Medvedev, postgraduate student
125993, bld.6, MiusskayaSquare, Moscow
References
1. Bobyleva, O.M. (2010), P.M. “P.M. Golovachev and his work “Siberia. Nature. People. Life” as historical source of researching everyday life of peasants and other groups of Siberian population at the beginning of 20th century”, Science. Education and Culture, no. 4, pp. 17–23.
2. Dubrovskii, A.M. (2005), Istorik i vlast’: istoricheskaya nauka v SSSR i kontseptsiya istorii feodal’noi Rossii v kontekste politiki i ideologii (1930–1950-e gg.) [Historian and power. Historical science in the USSR and the concept of the history of feudal Russia in the context of politics and ideology (1930s–1950s).], Izdatel’stvo Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. akad. I.G. Petrovskogo, Bryansk, Russia.
3. Guzei, Ya.S. (2014), “Zheltaya opasnost’ ”: predstavleniya ob ugroze s Vostoka v Rossiiskoi imperii v kontse XIX – nachale XX v. [“Yellow peril”. Visions of Eastern danger in the Russian Empire at the turn of 19th–20th centuries], Ph.D. Thesis, St. Petersburg, available at: https://dlib.rsl.ru/01007910267 (Accessed 14 October 2020).
4. Rybachenok, I.S. (2012), Zakat velikoi derzhavy. Vneshnyaya politika Rossii na rubezhe XIX–XX vv.: tseli, zadachi i metody [Sunset of the great Empire. The foreign policy of Russia at the turn of 19th – 20th centuries. Issues, goals and methods], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia.
5. Ukhtomskii, E.E. (1900), K sobytiyami v Kitae. Ob otnosheniyakh Zapada i Rossii k Vostoku [On the events in China. The relations of the West and Russia towards the East], Vostok, St. Petersburg, Russia.
6. Yadrintsev, N.M. (1892), Sibir’, kak koloniya v geograficheskom, etnograficheskom i istoricheskom otnoshenii [Siberia as a colony in the geographical, ethnographical and historical terms], I.M. Sibiryakov, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Medvedev К.А. P.M. Golovachev. The Far East in the thoughts of the historian. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2021;(1):50-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2021-1-50-61