Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"

Advanced search

P.M. Golovachev. The Far East in the thoughts of the historian

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2021-1-50-61

Abstract

The  author  of  the  article  makes  an  attempt  to  analyze  the  views  of  Russian  historian  Peter  Mikhailovich  Golovachev.  Those  views  concerned  issues of Russian policy in the Far East in the late 19th – early 20th century. The basis of the article is analyzing P.M. Golovachev’s treatise “Russia in the Far East”. The author of the article intends not only to research different aspects of Russian Far Eastern policy raised in that treatise. The analysis of intellectual  context  has  an  equal  significance.  The  author  makes  an  attempt  to represent specific features of Russian public thought at the turn of the ages. Researching of P.M. Golovachev’s views enables to identify several intellectual transformations concerned Russian society’s visions of the Far East.  The  author  of  the  article  emphasizes  that  historical  knowledge  allowed  P.M. Golovachev having an unconventional approach to the consideration of issues of interest to the Russian public. The latter was expressed, in particular, in criticism of well-established ideas and concepts.  The  author  concludes  arguing  that  P.M.  Golovachev’s  work  was  the  great  example of the Far East development project. The emergence of such projects became  the  forerunner  of  the  sphere  of  knowledge,  which  later  became  known  as “geopolitics”.

About the Author

К. А. Medvedev
Russian State University fortheHumanities
Russian Federation

Konstantin A. Medvedev, postgraduate  student

125993, bld.6, MiusskayaSquare, Moscow



References

1. Bobyleva, O.M. (2010), P.M. “P.M. Golovachev and his work “Siberia. Nature. People. Life” as historical source of researching everyday life of peasants and other groups of Siberian population at the beginning of 20th century”, Science. Education and Culture, no. 4, pp. 17–23.

2. Dubrovskii, A.M. (2005), Istorik i vlast’: istoricheskaya nauka v SSSR i kontseptsiya istorii feodal’noi Rossii v kontekste politiki i ideologii (1930–1950-e gg.) [Historian and power. Historical science in the USSR and the concept of the history of feudal Russia in the context of politics and ideology (1930s–1950s).], Izdatel’stvo Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. akad. I.G. Petrovskogo, Bryansk, Russia.

3. Guzei, Ya.S. (2014), “Zheltaya opasnost’ ”: predstavleniya ob ugroze s Vostoka v Rossiiskoi imperii v kontse XIX – nachale XX v. [“Yellow peril”. Visions of Eastern danger in the Russian Empire at the turn of 19th–20th centuries], Ph.D. Thesis, St. Petersburg, available at: https://dlib.rsl.ru/01007910267 (Accessed 14 October 2020).

4. Rybachenok, I.S. (2012), Zakat velikoi derzhavy. Vneshnyaya politika Rossii na rubezhe XIX–XX vv.: tseli, zadachi i metody [Sunset of the great Empire. The foreign policy of Russia at the turn of 19th – 20th centuries. Issues, goals and methods], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia.

5. Ukhtomskii, E.E. (1900), K sobytiyami v Kitae. Ob otnosheniyakh Zapada i Rossii k Vostoku [On the events in China. The relations of the West and Russia towards the East], Vostok, St. Petersburg, Russia.

6. Yadrintsev, N.M. (1892), Sibir’, kak koloniya v geograficheskom, etnograficheskom i istoricheskom otnoshenii [Siberia as a colony in the geographical, ethnographical and historical terms], I.M. Sibiryakov, St. Petersburg, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Medvedev К.А. P.M. Golovachev. The Far East in the thoughts of the historian. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2021;(1):50-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2021-1-50-61

Views: 107


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6339 (Print)