On the question of the role of Islamic religious figures in the context of the Turkestan campaigns of the Russian Empire. On the example of the correspondence of the Orenburg Border Commission with Mullah Shagimardanov

The middle of the 19th century became the starting point for the Russian Empire in terms of the conquest of the Kokand Khanate and the Bukhara Emirate, as well as its final positions consolidation in the region by creating the Turkestan Governor-General in the annexed territories in 1867. The defeat of the Russian Empire in the Crimean War forced the government to take more decisive measures to annex Kokand and Bukhara through a large-scale military campaign, however the need to solidify its hold on the region as soon as possible required the command to make some new strategic decisions and cooperate with representatives of the local elite, merchants and clergy. The article is intended to significantly fill the historiographical gap in the research of the cooperation between the Russian command and the Muslim institutions within the framework of the annexation of Central Asia by introducing and analyzing previously unpublished sources from the State Archive of the Orenburg Region. The article reviews examples of cooperation with representatives of the elite, merchants and clergy, their influence on the possible peaceful settlement of the conflict or its escalation, including the issue of collaboration and espionage in the Muslim environment, possible potential benefits and the need for cooperation with the Russian army. The conclusions of the article allow revising traditional views on the positions of Islamic leaders, as well as reevaluating the significance of a religious factor as one of the most important elements in the system of confrontation of Asian khanates with Russia.

International relations, Central Asia, khanates, Russian Empire, Islam, religion, Turkestan campaigns

1. Abashin, S.N. (2007), Natsionalizmy v Srednei Azii: v poiskakh identichnosti [Nationalisms in Central Asia. In search of identity], Saint Petersburg, Russia.

2. Abashin, S.N. (2008), “Reflections on ‘Central Asia as part of the Russian Empire’ ”, Ab Imperio, no. 4, pp. 456–471.

3. Abashin, S.N. (2015), Sovetskii kishlak: mezhdu kolonializmom i modernizatsiei [Soviet kishlak (village). Between colonialism and modernization], Moscow, Russia.

4. Andreev, A.A. (2011), “The riverbed of the Amu-Darya, ‘pesoshnoe (sandy) gold’ or the policy of Peter the Great in Central Asia”, Petrovskoe vremya v litsakh – 2011: Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Ermitazha. T. 48: Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii [Peter’s time in persons – 2011: State Hermitage Museum, vol. 48: Proceedings of the Scientific Conference, pp. 12–20.

5. Andreev, A.A. and Rezvan, M.E. (2019), “The development of the diplomatic tradition of the Persian, Khiva and Bukhara embassies in Russia from the end of the 16th to the beginning of the 18th century”, Kunstkamera, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 51–62.

6. Arapov, D.Y. (1981), Bukharskoe khanstvo v russkoi vostokovedcheskoi istoriografii [Bukhara Khanate in Russian Oriental historiography], Moscow, USSR.

7. Bekmakhanov, E.B. (1946), “On the socio-economic consequences of Kazakhstan’s accession to Russia”, Bol’shevik Kazakhstana, no. 11–12, pp. 44–60.

8. Dyakin, B.C. (1995), “The national question in the internal policy of Tsarism (19th century)”, Voprosy istorii, no. 9, pp. 70–83.

9. Fioletov, I. (1941), “Bukhara and Khiva Khanates and their relations with Russia”, Istoricheskii zhurnal, no. 3, pp. 13–29.

10. Galuzo, P.G. (1929), Turkestan – koloniya (Ocherk istorii Turkestana ot zavoevaniya russkimi do revolyucii 1917 g.) [Turkestan – colony (An essay on the history of Turkestan from the conquest by the Russians to the revolution of 1917)], Moscow, USSR.

11. Erofeeva, I.V. (2007), “The handwritten legacy of Lieutenant Ya.P. Gaverdovsky on the history, geography and ethnography of the Kazakh steppe”, in Istoriya Kazakhstana v russkikh istochnikakh XVI–XX vekov. T. 5: Pervye istoriko-etnograficheskie opisaniya kazakhskikh zemel’. Pervaya polovina XIX veka [The history of Kazakhstan in Russian sources of the 16–20th centuries, vol. 5: The first historical and ethnographic descriptions of the Kazakh lands. The first half of the 19th century], Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, pp. 1–114.

12. Izbasarova, G.B. (2017), “M.V. Ladyzhensky a developer of the regional policy of the Russian Empire”, Voprosy istorii, no. 12, pp. 112–122.

13. Khalfin, N.A. (1960), Politika Rossii v Srednei Azii (1857–1868) [Russia’s policy in Central Asia (1857–1868)], Moscow, USSR.

14. Kochnev, A.V. (2017), “Russian subjects in Khiva captivity at the end of the 18th – beginning of the 19th century. Ways to solve the issue and consequences”, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 423, pp. 100–104.

15. Kudryavtseva, E.P. (2018), “Activity of the Orenburg Border Commission as a unit of the Russian Foreign Ministry”, Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoj akademii nauk, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 51–55.

16. Lavrent’ev, V. (1930), Kapitalizm v Turkestane. Burzhuaznaya kolonizatsiya Srednei Azii) [Capitalism in Turkestan. Bourgeois colonization of Central Asia], Moscow, USSR.

17. Lebedev, L.V. (1936), “From the history of Kazakhs’ relations with Tsarist Russia in the 18th century”, Krasnyi arkhiv, vol. 5, pp. 208–311.

18. Lunin, B.V. (1965), Srednyaya Aziya v dorevolyutsionnom i sovetskom vostokovedenii [Central Asia in pre-revolutionary and Soviet Oriental studies], Tashkent, USSR.

19. Lysenko, Yu.A. (2019), “The question of the trustworthiness of Muslim educational institutions of the Turkestan region in the reports of the official of special assignments of the Ministry of Internal Affairs L. Naumova”, Bylye Gody. Russian Historical Journal, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1745–1753.

20. Matsuzato, K. (2018), “General governorships of Asian Russia. Geopolitics and territorial administration”, in Lichnost’, obshchestvo i vlast’ v istorii Rossii. Sbornik nauchnykh statei, posvyashchennyi 70-letiyu doktora istoricheskikh nauk, professora V.I. Shishkina [Personality, society, and power in the history of Russia. Collection of scientific articles about the 70th anniversary of the Doctor in History, professor V.I. Shishkin], Novosibirsk, Russia, pp. 74–103.

21. Mironov, B.N. (2018), Rossiiskaya imperiya: ot traditsii k modernu. V 3 tomakh. 2-e izdanie, ispravlennoe [The Russian Empire. From tradition to modernity, in 3 vol., 2-d ed., corrected], vol. 1, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

22. Morrison, A. (2008), Russian rule in Samarkand, 1868–1910. A comparison with British India, Oxford, UK.

23. Morrison, A. (2014), “Twin Imperial disasters. The invasions of Khiva and Afghanistan in the Russian and British official mind, 1839–1842”, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 253–300.

24. Ryabinsky, A. (1941), “Tsarist Russia and Bukhara in the era of imperialism”, Istorikmarksist, no. 4, pp. 3–25.