Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"

Advanced search

Geopolitization of the European Union in light of the redistribution of security burden in the Euro-Atlantic

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2023-4-10-27

Abstract

The first part of the research is dedicated to the relationship between the US and its European allies in the context of “dual decoupling” and “dual containment”. The author explores the redistribution of costs and burdens in the framework of confrontation with Russia and the growing rivalry with China. It is demonstrated that the post-2020 US – EU reset turned out to be declarative to a significant extent and unfavorable for the EU’s chances of real autonomy in the international arena. The second part of the article is focused on the EU geopolitization caused by the escalation in the competition among major powers and the multiple problems in its own development. This process revolves around the revival of the principle of “hard power” in the EU policy, its attempts to acquire subjectivity in the world affairs with reliance on coercive power, manoeuvring, adaptation to the conditions of polycentricity. Geopolitization of the EU leads to a radical review of the long-established notions including interdependence. The conclusion is drawn that the policies of dual decoupling, dual containment and the consequences of the Ukrainian crisis result in negative dynamics in the cost-benefit analysis of Russia’s rivals.

About the Author

Al. A. Gromyko
The Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod State University
Russian Federation

Alexey A. Gromyko, Dr. of Sci. (Political Studies), Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

11-3, Mokhovaya St., Moscow, 125009;

23, Gagarin Av., Nizhny Novgorod, 603022



References

1. Biscop, S. (2021), Grand strategy in 10 words. A guide to great power politics in the 21st century, Bristol University Press, Bristol, UK.

2. Butorina, O.V. and Borko, Yu.A. (2022), “Benefits of regional integration. Revision of the concept”, Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 1, pp. 5–20.

3. Cooper, R. (2000), The post-modern states and the world order, Demos, London, UK.

4. Fadeeva, L.A. (2021), “Modern challenges of identity politics in the EU”, Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 7, pp. 18–26.

5. Gromyko, Al.A. (2008), Obrazy Rossii i Britanii: real’nosti i predrassudki [Images of Russia and Britain. Realities and prejudices], IE RAS, Moscow, Russia.

6. Gromyko, Al.A. (2017), “European studies. Dilemmas of uniqueness and universality”, Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 2, pp. 6–17.

7. Gromyko, Al.A. (2019), “Dilemmas of the European Defence Union”, Outlines of Global Transformations. Politics, Economics, Law, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 6–28.

8. Heisbourg, F. (2020), Le temps des prédateurs: la Chine, les Etats-Unis, la Russie et nous, Odile Jacob, Paris, France.

9. Hutton, W. (2002), The world we’re in, Little, Brown, London, UK.

10. Kagan, R. (2018), The jungle grows back. America and our imperiled world, Knopf, New York, USA.

11. Kaveshnikov, N.Yu. and Domanov, A.O. (2023), “The impact of EU enlargement on the speed of decision-making”, Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 3, pp. 5–19.

12. Leonard, M. (2005), Why Europe will run the 21st century, Public Affairs, New York, USA.

13. Neymark, M.A. (2021), “ ‘Predators’ in geopolitics and Europe”, Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 7, pp. 152–161.

14. Portanskii, A.P. (2023), “EU – USA. New barriers to trade”, Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 4, pp. 119–131.

15. Potemkina, O.Yu. (2021), “New strategy of the EU Security Union”, in Evropeiskaya analitika 2020 [European Analytics 2020], IE RAS, Nestor-History, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 10–18.

16. Rifkin, J. (2004), The European dream. How Europe’s vision of the future is quietly eclipsing the American dream, Jeremy P. Tarcher Inc., New York, USA.

17. Romanova, T.A. (2021), “The discourse on the sovereignty of the European Union. Content and consequences”, Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 5, pp. 32–44.

18. Rubinskii, Yu.I. and Fedorov, S.M. (2021), “ ‘The submarine crisis’ and its possible consequences”, in Evropeiskaya analitika 2021 [European Analytics 2021], IE RAS, Nestor-History, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 143–150.

19. Schnabel, A.R. (2005), The nest superpower? The rise of Europe and its challenge to the United States, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Maryland, USA.

20. Shcherbak, I.N. (2021), “Strategic autonomy of the European Union at the crossroads”, Nauchno-analiticheskii vestnik IE RAN, no. 2, pp. 34–40.

21. Zhurkin, V.V. and Nosov, M.G. (2019), “The 20th anniversary of the military dimension of NATO”, Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 1, pp. 5–13.

22. Zhurkin, V.V. (2012), Evropeiskaya armiya: porazheniya i pobedy: Obshchaya politika bezopasnosti i oborony ES [The European army. Defeats and victories. The EU’s Common Security and Defense Policy], International Relations, Moscow, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Gromyko A.A. Geopolitization of the European Union in light of the redistribution of security burden in the Euro-Atlantic. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2023;(4):10-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2023-4-10-27

Views: 172


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6339 (Print)