Dynamics of adaptation of society in conditions of global distress. Analysis of the situation from February 2022 – February 2023
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2023-4-209-234
Abstract
The article considers the public reaction to the Special Military Operation launched in February 2022, which certainly became a stress for the Russian population. The data from different companies, that conducted polls between March and november, were collected and the subsequent analysis of the polling materials showed a curious dynamics of public opinion change. The reaction of the population, characterized by anxiety and fears and initially quite inert, gradually began to transform towards more and more support – both verbal and effective – for the Special Operation and the State. In addition, the phenomenon of individual self-organization of citizens to provide various kinds of assistance to combatants, the wounded, residents of new territories, institutions, animals, etc. has emerged. Active participation in providing assistance becomes an adaptive factor that relieves stress. In addition, active assistance to the Special Operation on the part of citizens becomes a model and an incentive for others, who until a certain time were in a state of waiting, to be included in that process. The positive tendencies of the process are obvious. Such reactions are anthroposystemic in nature and require special approaches to preserve social stability and consolidation of society as a whole
About the Authors
G. G. ErshovaRussian Federation
Galina G. Ershova, Dr. of Sci. (History), professor
Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
A. A. Kuleshova
Russian Federation
Anna A. Kuleshova
Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Arshavskii, V.V. and Rotenberg, V.S. (1984), Poiskovaya aktivnost’ i adaptatsiya [Search activity and adaptation], N auka, Moscow, USSR.
2. Ershova, G.G. (2000), “Civilization processes. Urban genesis in the Old and N ew Worlds”, in Razvitie tsivilizatsii v Novom Svete [Development of civilization in the New World], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 8–29.
3. Ershova, G.G. (2003), Asimmetriya zerkal’nogo mira [Asymmetry of the mirror world], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
4. Ershova, G.G. (2011), “Conflict as a law of the system development. Discursive practices in preparing a conflict”, in Konflikt v yazyke i kommunikatsii [Conflict in language and communication], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 11–27.
5. Ershova, G.G. (2011), “The role of scientific knowledge in the development of the anthroposystem”, Tsivilizatsiya znanii: problema cheloveka v nauke XXI veka: Trudy 12-i Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, g. Moskva, 22–23 aprelya 2011 g. [Civilization of knowledge. The issue of man in science of the 21st century. Proceedings of 12th International Scientific Conference, Moscow, 22–23 Apr. 2011], Rossiiskii novyi universitet, Moscow, Russia, pp. 16–28.
6. Ershova, G.G. (2012), “Anthroposystem. Communication models and regulated integration”, Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya, no. 4, pp. 11–25.
7. Ershova, G.G. (2013), “Reproduction of scientific knowledge and technology as a characteristic of the anthroposystem”, World of psychology, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 50–66.
8. Ershova, G.G. (2017), “Issues of adaptation and maladaptation during changing eras”, in Sotsiokul’turnye resursy cheloveka kak sposob aktivnoi adaptatsii: povedencheskie strategii v usloviyakh sotsial’nogo stressa [Sociocultural resources for a person as a way of active adaptation. Behavioral strategies under conditions of social stress], Akademicheskii proekt, Moscow, Russia, pp. 9–30.
Review
For citations:
Ershova G.G., Kuleshova A.A. Dynamics of adaptation of society in conditions of global distress. Analysis of the situation from February 2022 – February 2023. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2023;(4/2):209-234. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2023-4-209-234