Public diplomacy as a tool for implementing the foreign policy of the Vatican: an analysis of the strategic narrative of Pope Francis I
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2024-2-144-162
Abstract
Modern scientific research shows that religion increasingly deter -mines the way of life of the societies where traditional confessions have become widespread. The social transformations in the developing and developed states caused by economic modernization and migration processes, as well as the ineffectiveness of the governance models used by the political elites are mentioned as reasons. The world religions adapt to the modern situation and try to influence the socio-political processes. This is also characteristic of the Vatican, the city-state that administers the Roman Catholic Church. An important goal of the Vatican policy over the past decade is to raise the profile of the Catholic Church beyond its traditional sphere of influence. Through the analysis of the strategic narrative of Pope Francis I, the article considers the public diplomacy of the Vatican as a tool to implement its foreign policy. The purpose of the research is to determine the uniqueness of the strategic narrative of the Vatican’s public diplomacy during the early pontificate of Francis I, aimed at transforming the image of the Roman Catholic Church and strengthening its relations with the faithful abroad. Emphasizing the pontiff’s dual role as head of a sovereign state and head of the Roman Catholic Church, the study uses the frame analysis to identify the key ideas articulated in the pontiff’s rhetoric. The results of the analysis show that Pope FrancisI’s speeches to the public in the early years of his pontificate were based on the ideas of collective responsibility, universal values, and a call to action. An integrated reflection on these three frameworks suggests that the RCC’s public diplomacy efforts go far beyond the Catholic audiences.
About the Author
P. K. SimonovRussian Federation
Pavel K. Simonov , degree candidate
6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Balmas, M. (2017), “Bad news: The changing coverage of national leaders in foreign media of Western democracies”, Mass Communication and Society, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 663–685.
2. Bowen, S.A. (2004), “Expansion of ethics as the 10th generic principle of public relations excellence: A Kantian theory and model for managing ethical issues”, Journal of Public Relations Research , vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 65–92.
3. Brewer, P.R., Aday, S. and Gross, K. (2005), “Do Americans trust other nations? A panel study”, Social Science Quarterly, no. 1, pp. 36–51.
4. Cull, N.J. (2008), “Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science , vol. 616, pp. 31–54.
5. Cull, N. (2010), “Public diplomacy: Seven lessons for its future from its past”, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, vol. 6, pp. 11–17.
6. Gamson, W. A., Modigliani, A. (1989), “Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructivist approach”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 1–37.
7. Gilboa, E. (2008), “Searching for a theory of public diplomacy”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 616, pp. 55–77.
8. Golan, G. J. and Himelboim, I. (2016), “Can world system theory predict news flow on twitter? The case of government-sponsored broadcasting”, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1150–1170.
9. Grunig, J.E., ed. (2013), Excellence in public relations and communication management, Routledge, London, UK.
10. Gutkowski, S. (2016), We are the Very Model of a Moderate Muslim State: The Amman Messages and Jordan’s Foreign Policy, International Relations. 2016. vol. 30 (2). pp. 206–226.
11. Handelman, S. (2012), “We are the very model of a moderate Muslim state: The Amman messages and Jordan’s foreignpolicy”,Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 23, pp. 162–178.
12. Kelley, J.R. (2009), “Between ‘Take-offs’ and ‘Crash Landings’: Situational aspects of public diplomacy”, in Snow, N. and Taylor, Ph.M., eds., Routledge handbook of public diplomacy ,Rougledge, New York,USA,pp.72–85.
13. Kochhar, S.K. and Molleda,J.C. (2015),“Theevolving linksbetween international public relations and corporate diplomacy”, in Golan, G. ., Yang, S.-U. and Kinsey, D.F., International public relations and public diplomacy: Communication and engagement, PeterLangPublishing, New York,USA,pp.51–72.
14. Lebedeva, M., (2015), “Public diplomacy in conflict resolution”, International Trends/ Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, vol. 13, no. 4 (43), pp. 45–56.
15. Lim, J.S., Yang, S.U. and Chung, A. (2015), “ ‘Will you join us?’ Use of the Partake-in-Our-Cause (PIOC) message in light of negative news”, International Journal of Strategic Communication, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 44–61.
16. Lunkin, R.N. (2018), “The social and political role of religion in Europe: the demand for Christian identity”, Kontury global’nykh transformatsii, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 46–64.
17. Mueller, S.L. (2009), “The nexus of U.S. public diplomacy and citizen diplomacy”, in Snow, N. and Taylor, Ph.M., eds., Routledge handbook of public diplomacy, Rougledge,New York,USA,pp.101–110.
18. Nye, J.S. (2008), “Public diplomacy and soft power”, in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 616, no. 1, pp. 94–109.
19. Nye, J.S. (2004), Soft power: The means to success in world politics , Public Affairs, New York,USA.
20. Nye, J.S. (2011), The future of power,1sted., Public Affairs,New York,USA.
21. Rinke, E.M., Willnat, L. and Quandt, T. (2015), “The Obama factor: Change and stability in cultural and political anti-Americanism”, International Journal of Communication , no. 1. pp. 2954–2979.
22. Simonov, P.K. (2023), “Transformation of Vatican public diplomacy. New challenges and renewed strategic priorities”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series “Political Science. History. International Relations”, no. 4, pp. 143–153.
23. Snow, N. and Taylor, P., eds. (2009), Routledge handbook of public diplomacy, Routledge, New York,USA.
24. Tsvetkova, N.A. (2020), “The digital diplomacy as a phenomenon of international relations: Research methodology”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series “Political Science. History. International Relations”, no. 2, pp. 37–47.
25. Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T. and Stanyer, J. (2012), “The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings”, Journalism , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 203–220.
26. White, C.L. (2015), “Exploring the role of private-sector corporations in public diplomacy”, Public Relations Inquiry, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 305–321.
27. Yazkova, V.E. (2023), “ ‘Soft power’ of Pope Francis”, in Entina, E.G., ed., “Soft power” in the Black Sea, Institute of Europe , Moscow, Russia, pp. 118–131.
28. Zaharna, R.S. (2009), “Mapping out a spectrum of public diplomacy initiatives: Information and relational communication frameworks”, in Snow, N. and Taylor, Ph.M., eds., Routledge handbook of public diplomacy, Rougledge, New York, USA, pp. 86–100.
Review
For citations:
Simonov P.K. Public diplomacy as a tool for implementing the foreign policy of the Vatican: an analysis of the strategic narrative of Pope Francis I. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2024;(2):144-162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2024-2-144-162