Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"

Advanced search

Public policies for food sovereignty in Japan and Ecuador: a comparative analysis

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2024-6-144-157

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of agri-food policy in the State of Japan and the Republic of Ecuador. With the help of a case study method and the principle of unity of logical and historical, the author verified the structural characteristics of the functioning of the agricultural sectors of the two states. The models of Food sovereignty policy implementation adapted to the specific socio-humanitarian and political-legal landscapes of the two states were identified and compared based on the cross-cultural analysis and a comparative approach. It was found that the implementation of the strategic principles of food sovereignty is equally a priority not only for the modern countries of the Global South, but also for the countries of the Global North. In particular, the author proves that through the institutionalization of profile models (Shokuiku and Buen Vivir), the Governments of Japan and Ecuador, are implementing a number of strategically important national tasks. For instance, they strengthen local food systems, reduce the “metabolic rift” between urban and rural areas, protect biodiversity and popularize environmentally sustainable farming methods. At the same time, the author verified the structural shortcomings of the programs implemented in the two states. In particular, the problems associated with the cultivation of synthetically modified organisms, the monopolization of the domestic food market, the re-McDonaldization of the population and gaining independence from large TNCs.

About the Author

A. V. Malov
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Aleksandr V. Malov, Cand. of Sci. (Political Science)

6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047



References

1. Albo, X. (2009), “Suma Qamana = El buen convivir”, Revista Obets, vol. 4, pp. 25–40.

2. Brassel, F. (2011), “Las dinamicas monopolicas de la agroindustria”, in Brassel, F., Breilh, J., Zapatta, A., eds., ¿Agroindustria y Soberanía Alimentaria?, SIPAE, Quito, Ecuador.

3. Busscher, N., Parra, C. and Vanclay, F. (2020), “Environmental justice implications of land grabbing for industrial agriculture and forestry in Argentina”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. vol. 63. no. 3. pp. 500–522.

4. Chugrov, S.V. and Malov, A.V. (2019), “Food sovereignty and education: A Japanese type of harmonization”, RUDN Journal of Sociology, no. 4, pp. 665–677.

5. Corson, C., MacDonald, K.I. and Neimark, B. (2013), “Grabbing ‘Green’: Markets, environmental governance and the materialization of natural capital”, Human Geography, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15.

6. Donkers, H. (2014), “Sustainable food security. A paradigm for local and regional food systems”, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 89–102.

7. Durkheim, E. (1933), The division of labor in society, Macmillan, New York, USA.

8. Farina, F. (2018), “Japan’s gastrodiplomacy as soft power: global washoku and national food security”, Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 131–146.

9. Giunta, I. (2014), “Food sovereignty in Ecuador: peasant struggles and the challenge of institutionalization”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1201–1224.

10. Giunta, I. (2018), “Soberanía alimentaria entre derechos del buen vivir y políticas agrarias en Ecuador”, Revista THEOMAI, no. 38, pp. 109–122.

11. Giunta, I. and Vitale, A. (2013), “Politiche e pratiche di sovranità alimentare” Agriregionieuropa, no. 33, pp. 81–83.

12. Gudynas, E. (2011), “Buen vivir: Today’s tomorrow”, Development, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 441–447.

13. Iturralde, P. (2013), “Los ejes de acumulación en el Ecuador de la Revolución Ciudadana”, in Herrera, S., Sanchez, P., Iturralde, P. and Latorre, S. ¿A quién le Importa los Guayacanes?, IEE-CDES, Quito, Ecuador, pp. 83–107.

14. Iwabuchi, K. (2002), Recentering globalization: popular culture and Japanese transnationalism, Duke University Press, London, UK.

15. Malov, A.V. (2018), “International food regime”, MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 1, pp. 127–147.

16. Sauer, S. and Borras, S. (2016), “Land Grabbing e Green Grabbing: uma leitura da ‘corrida na produção acadêmica’ sobre a apropriação global de terras”, Revista Campo-Território, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 6–42.

17. Sehn Korting, M., Assumpção e Lima, D. and Sobreiro Filho, J. (2023), “Brazilian agricultural frontier: land grabbing, land policy, and conflicts”, IDS Bulletin: Transforming Development Knowledge, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 73–88.

18. Takeda, H. (2014), “Securitizing food in Japan: global crises, domestic problems and a neoliberal state”, in Vosse, W., Drifte, R. and Blechinger-Talcott, V., eds., Governing Insecurity in Japan: The domestic discourse and policy response, Routledge, New York, USA, pp. 92–112.

19. Walsh, C. (2009), Interculturalidad, estado, sociedad: luchas (de)coloniales de nuestra época, UASB-Abya Yala, Quito, Ecuador.


Review

For citations:


Malov A.V. Public policies for food sovereignty in Japan and Ecuador: a comparative analysis. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2024;(6):144-157. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2024-6-144-157

Views: 82


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6339 (Print)