AI-assisted methods in US foreign policy analysis: A review of current practices
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2025-4-12-27
Abstract
This article examines the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the analysis of foreign policy and international relations, with a particular emphasis on the United States. It identifies four principal fields of AI application: forecasting international events, modeling diplomatic negotiations, evaluating the risks of automated decision-making in the nuclear domain, and analyzing foreign policy decision-making processes. The article offers a comparative assessment of AI systems developed in the United States, China, and Russia, underscoring the growing relevance of specialized and domain-specific AI models as tools for expert analysis. Particular attention is devoted to benchmarking methodologies for evaluating generative models and to the critical role of human expertise in interpreting AI-generated outputs.
About the Author
N. A. TsvetkovaRussian Federation
Natalia A. Tsvetkova, Dr. of Sci. (History), professor
bldg. 1, bld. 2/3, Khlebny Line, Moscow, Russia, 117997
References
1. Nadibaidze, A. and Miotto, N. (2023), “The impact of AI on strategic stability is what states make of it: comparing US and Russian discourses”, Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 47–67.
2. Hafner-Burton, E.M., Haggard, S. and Victor, D.G. (2024), “Advisers and aggregation in foreign policy decision-making”, American Political Science Review, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 435–450, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055424000081.
3. Jensen, B., Reynolds, I. and Atalan, Ya. (2024), “What AI thinks about foreign policy decisions: Benchmarking models for strategy and statecraft”, Center for Strategic and International Studies, available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/what-ai-thinksabout-foreign-policy-decisions-benchmarking-models-strategy-and-statecraft (Accessed 4 March 2025).
4. Jervis, R. (2017), Perception and misperception in international politics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
5. Khong, Yu.F. (1992), Analogies at war: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam decisions of 1965, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
6. Mochtak, M. and Turcsanyi, R.Q. (2021), “Studying Chinese foreign policy narratives: Introducing the Ministry of Foreign Affairs press conferences corpus”, Journal of Chinese Political Science, vol. 26, pp. 743–761, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-021-09762-3.
7. Reynolds, I. and Jensen, B. (2024), “Can AI help end a war? Using generative AI to explore peace scenarios in Ukraine”, Center for Strategic and International Studies, available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/can-ai-help-end-war-using-generativeai-explore-peace-scenarios-ukraine (Accessed 4 March 2025).
8. Tsvetkova, N.A. (2020), “The digital diplomacy as a phenomenon of international relations: Research methodology”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Political Science. History. International Relations” Series, no. 2, pp. 37–47.
9. Tsvetkova, N.A. (2024), “The role of historical analogies in U.S. foreign policy decisionmaking, 1945–2024”, Amerikanskii ezhegodnik – 2024 [American Yearbook – 2024], Ves’ mir, Moscow, Russia, pp. 57–80.
10. Tsvetkova, N.A. (2025), “The predictive power of historical analogies in foreign policy decision-making: An AI-assisted approach” [Preprint], Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Springer Nature/Research Square, available at: https:// www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6490065 (Accessed 4 March 2025).
11. Turcsanyi, R.Q., Liškutin, K. and Mochtak, M. (2023), “Diffusion of influence? Detecting China’s footprint in foreign policies of other countries”, Chinese Political Science Review, vol. 8, pp. 461–486, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-022-00217-5.
Review
For citations:
Tsvetkova N.A. AI-assisted methods in US foreign policy analysis: A review of current practices. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2025;(4):12-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2025-4-12-27