Civic identity sustainability risks in the context of sociocultural transformations of the contemporary Russian society

   The article studies major symbolic concepts that constitute substantial content of the all-Russian civic identity analyzes distinct aspects of state identity policy and sustainability factors of civic identity in contemporary Russian society. The civic identity was pursued as the type of social identity that defines the goal setting of political process participants. The utilization of the concepts of myth-symbol complex and ethno-symbolism was instrumental in defining of the system-forming symbols and myths of the all-Russian civic identity, even as in designating the importance of maintaining their relevance under the conditions of competing nature of symbolic politics. The author outlines that the core of the all-Russian civic identity is based on the Soviet-era symbolic space, in which the symbol of the Victory in the Great Patriotic war plays the system-forming role. The implementation of state policy in the sphere of identity also mainly resembles the Soviet model. Meanwhile, sociocultural transformations of the Russian society which unfold in the field of demographic changes connected with soaring of the percentage of citizens who do not regard soviet symbolic space as the consolidator of civic identity, together with actualization of ethnic identities, could potentially reduce the efficacy of the present all-Russian civic identity configuration. As a potential risk-evading measure the author suggested using the existing concept of “state-forming ethnie” as the perspective symbolic foundation for civic identity.

1. Achkasov, V.A. (2013), “ ‘Politics of Memory’ as a tool for post-socialist ‘nation-building’ ”, The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 106–123.

2. Arutyunyan, Yu.V., Drobizheva, L.M. and Susokolov, A.A. (1999), Ehtnosotsiologiya [Ethnosociology], Aspekt Press, Moscow, Russia.

3. Avksent’ev, V.A., Aksyumov, B.V., Gritsenko, G.D., Ivanova, S.Yu. and Shul’ga, M.M. (2022), “Formation of Russian identity in the North Caucasus: Institutional and sociocultural framework”, POLITEKS: Politicheskaya ekspertiza, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 72–86.

4. Borshchevskii, G.A. (2023), “Traditional Russian values. Institutional analysis”, Politiya: Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 67–93.

5. Brown, R. (2000), “Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges”, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 745–778.

6. Budanov, M.A. (2023), “Diasporas and interethnic rivalry as factors of ethno-confessional tension in modern Russia”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 21. Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo), vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 140–157

7. Bulygina, T.A. and Ambartsumyan, K.R. (2022), “On the question of the history of the formation of the concept ‘new historical community – the Soviet people’ and its implementation in the 1970–1980^s”, History: Facts and Ssymbols, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 52–62.

8. Drobizheva, L.M., Arutyunova, E.M., Evseeva, M.A. et al. (2022), Rossiiskaya identichnost’ i mezhetnicheskie otnosheniya: Publichnyi diskurs i sotsial’naya praktika [Russian identity and interethnic relations. Public discourse and social practice], FNISTs RAN, Moscow, Russia.

9. Gill, G. (2011), Symbols and legitimacy in Soviet politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

10. Gill, G. (2013), Symbolism and regime change in Russia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

11. Gill, G. (2018), “Political symbols and regime change: The Russian experience”, Politics, Religion & Ideology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 494–509.

12. Gorkunova, O.S. (2014), “Mass historical consciousness of Russians at the turn of 20^th –21^th centuries”, Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 64–70.

13. Hutchinson, J. (2000), “Ethnicity and modern nations”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 651–669.

14. Koposov, N.E. (2011), Pamyat’ strogogo rezhima: Istoriya i politika v Rossii [The strict regime memory. History and politics in Russia], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia.

15. Levicheva, V.F. and Dimans, S.L. (2023), “Social identity as a result of informal interactions Friend or Foe”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studie”, Series, no. 2, pp. 73–83

16. Malinova, O.Yu. (2015), “The Great Patriotic War as a symbolic resource: The evolution of its representation in the official rhetoric 2000–2010”, Russia and the Contemporary World, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 6–29.

17. Malinova, O.Yu. (2018), “The memory policy as an area of symbolic policy”, in Miller, A.I. and Efremenko, D.V., eds., Metodologicheskie voprosy izucheniya politiki pamyati : Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Methodological issues of the memory politics research. Collected scientific works], Nestor-Istoriya, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

18. Malinova, O.Yu. (2019), “Who forms official historical narrative and how? Analysis of Russian practices”, Politiya: Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 103–126.

19. Martin, T. (2011), Imperiya «polozhitel’noi deyatel’nosti»: Natsii i natsionalizm v SSSR, 1923–1939 [The affirmative action empire: Nations and nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia.

20. Mazur, L. (2015), “Golden age mythology and the nostalgia of catastrophes in post-Soviet Russia”, Canadian Slavonic Papers, vol. 57, iss. 3–4, pp. 213–238.

21. Osadchaya, G.I. and Yudina, T.N. (2023), “Values of generations of migrants X, Y and Z from Central Asian countries”, in Saralieva, Z.Kh., ed., Kul’turnoe nasledie i svyaz’ pokolenii [The cultural heritage and generational bridge], NNGU im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.

22. Pain, E.A. (2024), “Nation and ethnos: The nonlinear evolution of ethnological concepts in Russia”, Universe of Russia, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 6–28.

23. Pain, E.A. and Fedyunin, S.Yu. (2017), Natsiya i demokratiya: perspektivy upravleniya kul’turnym raznoobraziem [Nation and democracy. The perspectives of cultural diversity governing], Mysl’, Moscow, Russia.

24. Polunov, A.Yu. (2023), “All-Russian civic identity: conceptual foundations and regional embodiment”, Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik, no. 96, pp. 124–133, available at: https://spajournal.ru/index.php/spa/article/view/61 (Accessed 3 March 2025).

25. Savinov, L.V., Simagina, O.V. and Skorykh, N.N. (2023), “State national policy strategy: Results and prospects for conceptualization”, Vestnik Rossiiskoi natsii, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 9–20.

26. Shcherbina, E.A. (2021), “Russian and native languages as identity factors (based on the results of expert surveys in the Karachay-Cherkess Republic)”, Herald of Anthropology, no. 1, pp. 121–132

27. Smith, A.D. (1988), The ethnic origins of nations, Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, USA.

28. Smith, A.D. (1991), National identity, Penguin Books, London, UK.

29. Tishkov, V.A. (1997), Ocherki teorii i politiki etnichnosti v Rossii [The essays on theory and policy of ethnicity in Russia], Russkii mir, Moscow, Russia.

30. Vdovichenko, L.N. (2023), “The role of political culture in the formation of a common civic identity”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies” Series, no. 3, part 2, pp. 277–287.