J. Dewey’s scientific method influence on Chinese historians’ research method in the early 20th century (Hu Shi and Gu Jiegang as an example)
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2025-5-35-47
Abstract
The article attempts to clarify the circumstances under which the “scientific method” invented by the American philosopher John Dewey was indirectly borrowed by the Chinese historian Gu Jiegang. Realizing what stands behind the “method” as presented by the Chinese scholar Hu Shi, who was a student of John Dewey, Gu Jiegang considered it suitable to be applied in the historical researches and incorporated into the foundation of his own hypothesis and approach. Michel Espagne’s theory of cultural transfer serves as the theoretical and methodological framework of the study. An analysis of the original method and the circumstances of its creation suggests Dewey’s own assumption of its universal applicability, not limited to scientific research. With Hu Shi’s direct references to the “scientific method,” his own presentation in Chinese is not identical to the original – a similar observation applies to Gu Jiegang’s interpretation, who refers exclusively to the Chinese scholar’s. In conclusion, the article argues that the “scientific method” had an indirect influence on historical research in Republican China. Moreover, use of references to the concepts of Western and more famous colleagues was rather intended to provide scientists with reputable support for their own approaches.
About the Author
S. G. PetrovaRussian Federation
Sylvia G. Petrova
6-6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, Russia, 125047
References
1. Cowles, H. (2020), The scientific method: An evolution of thinking from Darwin to Dewey, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
2. 胡適. 胡適文集 (第2冊). 北京大學出版社, 2013. 頁518 [Hu, S. (2013), Collected Works, vol. 2, Beijing daxue chubanshe, Beijing, PRC].
3. 刘华初. 透过胡适对杜威实用主义的解读看中西文化差异 // 学术研究. 2015. 10 期. 14–18頁 [Liu, H. (2015), “A look into the differences between Chinese and Western cultures through Hu Shi’s interpretation of John Dewey’s pragmatism”, Academic Research, vol. 10, pp. 14–18].
4. Rudolph, J.L. (2005), “Epistemology for the masses: The origins of ‘the scientific method’ in American schools”, History of Education: Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 3. pp. 341–376.
5. 杨旭. 杜威来中国原因及相关问题考略 // 当代教育科学. 2017. 11期. 33–38頁 [Yang, X. (2017), “A brief study on the reasons why Dewey came to China and related issues”, Contemporary Education Sciences, vol. 11, pp. 33–18].
6. Espagne, M. (2018), Istoriya tsivilizatsii kak kul’turnyi transfer [History of civilizations as a cultural transfer], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia.
7. Kiselev, V.A. (2007), Istoriko-filosofskaya kontseptsiya kitaiskogo filosofa-pragmatika Khu Shi (1891–1962) [Historical-philosophical concept of the Chinese philosopherpragmatist Ha Shih (1891–1962), Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation (Philosophy), Rossiiskii universitet druzhby narodov (RUDN), Moscow, Russia.
8. Petrova, S.G. (2021) “ ‘Layer-by-layer construction of the ancient history of China’: Gu Jiegang’s method and hypothesis“, Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 144–156.
Review
For citations:
Petrova S.G. J. Dewey’s scientific method influence on Chinese historians’ research method in the early 20th century (Hu Shi and Gu Jiegang as an example). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2025;(5):35-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2025-5-35-47















