Interdisciplinary methodology in historical research. Needs and experience of application
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2025-6-12-21
Abstract
The article analyzes the current state of historical scholarship and focuses on the transformation of research approaches in Russian and international historiography and the expanding range of methodologies used in research. It focuses on the importance of an integrated approach to modern historical research, particularly in the area of international relations. An integrated approach allows for a more comprehensive examination of the issues of foreign and domestic state policy, macro- and micro-history, and the formation of collective identities.
About the Author
Olga V. PavlenkoRussian Federation
Olga V. Pavlenko, Dr. of Sci. (History), Associate Professor,
6-6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047.
References
1. Adler, E. (2002), “Constructivism and international relations”, in Carlsnaes, W., ed, Handbook of international relations, SAGE Publications, London, UK, pp. 95–118.
2. Bayly, C.A. (2004), The birth of the modern world, 1780–1914: global connections and comparison, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK. (Blackwell History of the World)
3. Checkel, J.T. (1999), “Norms, institutions, and national identity in contemporary Europe”, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 84–114.
4. Hunt,M.H.(2000),“Die lange Krise der amerikanischen Diplomatiegeschichte und ihr Ende“, in Loth, W. and Osterhammel, J., eds., Internationale Geschichte: Themen – Ergebnisse – Aussichten, Oldenbourg, München, Germany, pp. 61–92.
5. Miller, A.I. (2014), “Empire and nation in the ‘Long 19th century’ ”, in Chubar’yan, A.O., ed., Vsemirnaya istoriya [World history], vol.5, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 246–263.
6. Mironov, B.N. (2014), Rossiiskaya imperiya: ot traditsii k modernu [The Russian Empire: from tradition to modernity], vol. 1, Dmitrii Bulanov, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
7. Onuf, N. (1998), “Constructivism: a user’s manual”, in Kubálková,V., ed., International relations in a constructed world, M.E. Sharpe, New York, USA, pp. 58–78.
8. Osterhammel, J. (2009), Die Verwandlung der Welt: eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, Beck, München, Germany.
9. Pavlenko,O.V.(2015), “Constructivist approach to the international relations study: possibilities and limits“, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Political Science. History. International Relations. Area Studies. Oriental Studies” Series, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 53–67.
10. Pavlenko,O.V.(2015),“[Review:] World history. In 6 volums. Vol.5: The world in the 19th century: On the path to industrial civilization. Moscow: Nauks,2014. 939p.”, Vestnik Rossiiskogo gumanitarnogo nauchnogo fonda, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 257–262.
11. Revyakin,A.V.(2014),“World politics in the last third of the19th – early 20th century], in Chubar’yan, A.O., ed., Vsemirnaya istoriya [Worldhistory], vol.5, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 811–844.
12. Soutou, G.-H. (2000), “Die französische Schule der Geschichte internationaler Beziehungen“, in Loth, W. and Osterhammel, J., eds., Internationale Geschichte: Themen – Ergebnisse – Aussichten, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, München, Germany, pp. 31–44.
13. Spindler, M. and Schieder, S. (2003), “Theorie(n) in der Lehre von den intemationalen Beziehungen”, in Spindler, M. and Schieder, S., eds., Theorien der internationalen Beziehungen, Leske und Budrich, Opladen, Germany, pp.7–34.
14. Ulbert,C.(2003), “Sozialkonstruktivismus“, in Spindler, M. and Schieder, S., eds., Theorien der internationalen Beziehungen, Leske und Budrich, Opladen, Germany, pp. 391–420.
15. Wendt, A. (1987), “The agent-structure-problem in international relations theory”, International Organization, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 335–370.
16. Wendt,A. (1992), “Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics”, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391–425.
Review
For citations:
Pavlenko O.V. Interdisciplinary methodology in historical research. Needs and experience of application. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2025;(6):12-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2025-6-12-21














