Political marketing in the face of new challenges
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2025-6-168-182
Abstract
The article attempts to examine the evolution of political marketing, its theoretical and methodological foundations and the differences from commercial marketing strategies. The author describes the dual role of the marketing technologies in politics: as an instrument of electoral mobilization and as a mechanism for structuring the political space. Special attention is paid to the interaction of the state and other actors in a competitive political environment, as well as to the interrelationships between political marketing and propaganda technologies. It is noted that modern political processes are characterized by high dynamism, uncertainty and fragmentation, which makes political marketing one of the key tools for managing public opinion and competition between political actors. However, classical approaches to its study are losing relevance in the context of digitalization, the transformation of the political market and the increasing complexity of political communication mechanisms. Moreover, the article describes the concept of a political market where supply generates demand, and marketing technologies are used in both open and latent power strategies. The study confirms the need to rethink political marketing as a hybrid mechanism of influence combining traditional and manipulative tools for managing political reality. The conclusions of the article emphasize the importance of adaptive marketing strategies in the context of the instability of the political landscape and the growing technological influence on political processes.
Keywords
About the Author
Albina R. SayfatovaRussian Federation
Albina R. Sayfatova, postgraduate student,
1, Kolmogorova St., Moscow, 119991.
References
1. Almond, G.A. and Verba, S. (2010), “Civil culture. An approach to the study of political culture”, Politiya, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 122–144.
2. Edelman, M. (2013), Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail, Elsevier, New York, USA.
3. Jungrav-Gieorgica, N. (2020), “Narrative policy framework – public policy as a battle of narratives”, Studia z Polityki Publicznej, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 109–135.
4. Klychkov, A.E. and Merkulov, P.A. (2019), “The problems of the conflict of political parties in a competitive political market: on the issue of political marketing”, Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie, vol. 131, no. 11, pp. 16–26.
5. Kupryashin, G.L. (2023), “Political and administrative abilities of public administration in conditions of turbulence and uncertainty”, Public Administration. E-journal, no. 97, pp. 174–189.
6. Maloney, K. and McGrath, C. (2021), “Rethinking public relations: Persuasion democracy and society”, Public Relations Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 220–226.
7. Mukhtarov, M.M. (2021), “Theoretical aspects of political marketing: basic concepts”, Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, vol. 53, no. 2–2, pp. 53–56.
8. Nedyak, I.L. (2010), “Political marketing: features of the development of the scientific research area”, Polis. Political Studies, no. 3, pp. 144–153.
9. Selva, D. (2011). “Net-based participation. An Italian case study”, in de Blasio, E., Hibbert, M. and Sorice, M., eds., Leadership and new trends in political communication. Selected papers, CMCS – LUISS, Rome, Italy, pp. 191–220.
10. Solov’ev, A.I. (2021), “Frontier zones of public policy”, Politicheskaya nauka, no. 3, pp. 183–204.
11. Solov’ev, A.I. (2022), “Latent functionality of public policy”, Politicheskaya nauka, no. 3, pp. 57–79.
Review
For citations:
Sayfatova A.R. Political marketing in the face of new challenges. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2025;(6):168-182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2025-6-168-182














