Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"

Advanced search

International political communications as a basic tool of foreign policy solidarity of post-Soviet states (using the example of joint statements by the CSTO member states)

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2026-3-153-172

Abstract

The article examines the international political communications of the member states of the Collective Security Treaty Organization. An analysis of the entire volume of joint statements by the CSTO’s statutory and working bodies, and the author’s personal experience in the Organization’s Secretariat allow us to conclude that this mechanism is the most important tool for foreign policy solidarity of the countries that are members of the regional organization for collective security in the post-Soviet space. The study highlights the main topics, periods of formation and development of the practice of joint statements, and examines the specifics of the lexical component of the CSTO political discourse. The active participation of all the statutory and working bodies of the association in the implementation of the mechanism under consideration is noted and it is emphasized that such a tool of collective communication is of particular interest to the media, experts, partners and other target audiences. Taking into account the relevance of the topics on which statements are being formed, their political level – heads of state, ministers of foreign affairs and defense, the collective position, the information becomes significant not only for the above-mentioned target audiences, but also for the general public.

About the Author

V. M. Strugovets
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Vitalii M. Strugovets, Cand. of Sci. (Political Science), associate professor

6-6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047



References

1. Albogachiev, A.A., Khamatkhanova, M.M., and Gandoloev, R.B. (2020), “Political communications in the modern system of public administration”, Sovremennaya nauka i innovatsii, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 130–141.

2. Belozerov, V.K. (2023), “International political communication in the context of digitalization of world development”, Outlines of Global Transformations, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 177–194.

3. Bolshakov, A.G. and Khramova, E.V. (2023), “Political communication in the period of international bifurcations”, Vestnik Baltiiskogo federal’nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, no. 2, pp. 96–104.

4. Chegodar, N.D. (2023), “Political communication in modern international relations on the example of the European Union”, Voprosy politologii, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 1332-1340.

5. Dzyuba, E.V. and Solopova, O.A. (2024), The language of politics in a multipolar world, Rossiya v global’nom mire, no. 3, pp. 181–195.

6. Fedotov I.I. (2023), Linguistic Characteristics of the Military-Political Discourse of International Organizations (based on the English and Russian Languages) [Lingvisticheskie kharakteristiki voenno-politicheskogo diskursa mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii (na materiale angliiskogo i russkogo yazykov], PhD. Thesis, Military University, Moscow, 2023.

7. Khomutova, T.N. and Naumova, K.A. (2017), Military-Political Discourse as a Special Type of Discourse, Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series “Linguistics”, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 49–53.

8. Kurbakov, I.A. (2019), “Military-political discourse as a hybrid type of discourse”, in Arupov, A.A., ed., Dostizheniya nauki v kontekste povysheniya kachestva zhizni i ustoichivogo razvitiya obshchestva: Sbornik nauchnykh statei mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii i IV Vserossiiskoi (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) konferentsii, Almaty, 29 aprelya 2019 g. [Achievements of science in the context of improving the quality of life and sustainable development of society. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference and IV All-Russian (with international participation) Conference, Almaty, April 29, 2019], Natsional’nyi issledovatel’skii institut mirovoi ekonomiki i mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii imeni E.M. Primakova RAN, Almaty, Kazakhstan, pp. 210–217.

9. Mavleev, R.R. (2019), Voenno-politicheskii diskurs: sotsial’no-kommunikativnye, lingvokognitivnye i perevodcheskie aspekty (na materiale kitaiskogo i russkogo yazykov) [Military-political discourse: Socio-communicative, linguocognitive, and yranslation aspects (based on the Chinese and Russian languages), Ph.D. Thesis (Philology), Moscow, Russia, 2019.

10. Mishkurov, E.N. (2020), “Modern military-political discourse: nomination, functions, language deviation, translation”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 22: Teoriya perevoda, no. 2, pp. 88–105.

11. Moshkina, Yu.V. (2019), “Structural and content features of military and political discourse: Theoretical aspects”, in Babayan, V.N., ed., Antropotsentricheskaya napravlennost’ lingvisticheskikh issledovanii polikul’turnogo voennogo i politicheskogo diskursa [Anthropocentric focus of linguistic research on multicultural military and political discourse], Tsifrovaya tipografiya, Yaroslavl’, Russia, pp. 123–131.

12. Petrishchev, E.V. (2021), “Development of international political communications in the post-soviet space: trends and features”, Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Obshchestvennye nauki, vol. 843, no. 2, pp. 116–128.

13. Romanova, Yu.G. and Du, H. (2023), “International communication in the field of business and law: features of the translation of political discourse”, Philological Sciences Bulletin, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 119–122.

14. Ryabova M.Yu. and Karukovets N.S. (2026), “Linguocultural specificity of diplomatic discourse texts”, SibScript, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 55–68.

15. Ryazanov, D.S. and Okhrimenko, O.V. (2016), “Terrorism in the post-Soviet states: General and specific (based on the analysis of electronic databases of terrorism)”, Teorii i problemy politicheskikh issledovanii, vol. 5, no. 5A, pp. 219–229.

16. Suchkov, M.A. (2022), “Transformation of political communication in the modern system of international relations”, in Aktual’nye problemy sotsial’no-politicheskikh kommunikatsii v sovremennom obshchestve: sbornik materialov regional’noi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii [Actual problems of socio-political communications in modern society. Proceedings of the Regional Scientific and Practical Conference], OOO “Izdatel’skii dom KDU”, Moscow, Russia, pp. 32–36.

17. Tormosheva, V.S. (2013), “Social and philosophical dimension of the concept of international communication”, Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences, no. 4, pp. 7–13.

18. Tormosheva, V.S. (2016), “International communication in postmodern political thought: A theoretical aspect”, Perm University Herald. Political Science, no. 3, pp. 76–94.

19. Tsybakov, D.L. (2021), “Development of international political communications in order to strengthen the collective security of the CSTO”, Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 155–163.

20. Tsybakov, D.L. (2021), “The factor of political communications in the process of militarization of the post-Soviet space”, Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Obshchestvennye nauki, no. 3, pp. 98–111.


Review

For citations:


Strugovets V.M. International political communications as a basic tool of foreign policy solidarity of post-Soviet states (using the example of joint statements by the CSTO member states). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2026;(3):153-172. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2026-3-153-172

Views: 148

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6339 (Print)