Online activity of illegal communities in the Telegram messenger: structure and methods of countering the spread of destructive ideas
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2026-3-208-222
Abstract
The work is devoted to the study of the structure of connections of illegal communities in the Telegram messenger within the Russian media space. The research is based on the network graph methodology and methods. Using social graphs allows you to identify nodes and edges in the information hub of prohibited content. The methodology allows us to form ideas about how the prohibited content is distributed: whether this process is centralized or decentralized, chaotic or controlled. The nature of the structure of mutual mentions between Telegram channels determines the extent to which an information bubble is created in thematic illegal resources and a network of influence on the media message and discourse of the national media space. In the context of the study, we are talking about negative illegal political discourse to mobilize users and involve them in the destabilization of the socio-political situation in the Russian Federation. When determining the nature of the dissemination of prohibited information and establishing an understanding of how unfriendly forces influence the media message and the minds of users, the state authorities of the Russian Federation can most effectively counteract digital risks and increase the number of deleted or blocked pieces of content. And, to start working not only with directive forms of countering prohibited information, but also using ways and methods of counter-discursive work.
About the Author
V. B. NaumovRussian Federation
Vladislav B. Naumov, General Radio Frequency Centre
7-5, Derbenevskaya Emb., Moscow, Russia, 117997
References
1. Antonova, E.Yu. (2023), “terrorist crimes in the era of digitalization: forms of activity and measures for counteraction”, Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 251–269.
2. Bystrova, Yu.V., Bidova, B.B. and Zaptiev, I.Z (2025), “Strategies for combating Internet extremism: global and national approaches”, Agrarnoe i zemel’noe pravo, no. 1, pp. 225–228.
3. Chepovskiy, A.A. (2023), “On the construction and analysis features of graphs of interacting objects in the Telegram-channels network”, Cybersecurity Issues, no. 1, pp. 75–81.
4. Grachev, M.N. (2023), “Echo chambers, epistemic bubbles and filter bubbles as actors of the Network communication space”, Rossiiskaya shkola svyazei s obshchestvennost’yu, no. 29, pp. 41–54.
5. Dombrovskaya, A.Yu., Parma, R.V. and Azarov, A.A. (2021), “Social and media infrastructure of civic participation of Russians: analysis of graphs of intersection of the audience of socio-political communities in Runet”, Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 158–174.
6. Druzhinin, A.M. (2025), “Destructive elements of online communication”, Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, no. 85, pp. 177–188.
7. Khachidogov, R.A. (2022), “Problems of detecting and blocking destructive media content in social Networks”, Zhurnal prikladnykh issledovanii, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 161–164.
8. Kiknadze, V.G. (2022), “The state policy of the Russian Federation on countering the spread extremist and terrorist ideology through information technologies”, Tomsk State University Journal of History, no. 76, pp. 25–30.
9. Kirilenko, V.P., Khlutkov, A.D. and Alekseev, G.V. (2023) “Methodology of combating extremism in cyberspace: the experience of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization”, Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 29–42.
10. Magdilova, L.V. and Yakhyaev, M.G. (2023), “Problems of countering the dissemination of extremist materials on the Internet”, Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry, no. 5, pp. 86–90.
11. Nikishin, V.D. (2022), “Harmful information in Inernet media: The “Overton Window” and the destructive Network current interrelationships”, Lex Russica, no. 11, pp. 131–148.
12. Pachina, N.V. and Kasenov, A.D. (2024), “Strategic directions, factors and conditions for countering the spread of information extremism”, Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, no. 4, pp. 35–48.
13. Ryzhova, N.I., Gosudarev, I.B. Gromova, O.N. and Magazeishchikov, E.A. (2025), “Analyzing of the availability of dangerous and destructive content in the main sources of information on the Internet for adolescents”, Perspectives of Science and Education, no. 1, pp. 401–422.
14. Shumov, P.V. and Vedeneeva, P.I. (2023), “Problems of spreading ‘fakes’: identification of information, legal aspect”, Humanities, Social-Economic and Social Sciences, no. 8, pp. 195–202.
15. Sinyawskaya, S.P., Pankova, E.N. (2022), “Peculiarities of the analysis of extremist discourse at the present stage”, Kriminalist, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 110–115.
16. Sokolov, A.Yu. (2024), “Legal counteraction to modern challenges and threats to information security”, Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn’, no. 1, pp. 22–31.
17. Teslenko, A.N. (2023), “ ‘Filter bubbles’ of youth consciousness”, Severnyi region: nauka, obrazovanie, kul’tura, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 54–62.
18. Tsimbal, V.N. (2022), “Analysis of destructive information in social Networks and messengers”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, no. 4, pp. 269–274.
19. Vorobiev, S.A. (2025), “Current issues of countering destructive content”, Ekonomika. Pravo. Obshchestvo, vol. 10, no. 2 (42), pp. 116–120.
Review
For citations:
Naumov V.B. Online activity of illegal communities in the Telegram messenger: structure and methods of countering the spread of destructive ideas. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2026;(3):208-222. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2026-3-208-222
JATS XML

















