Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"

Advanced search

Why study abroad? A mixed-methods evaluation of the effectiveness of US–Russia academic exchange programs

Abstract

This article focuses on the results of the research project that has been realized within The Stanford US – Russia Forum (SURF), which is a platform for Russian and American university students to work together on some of the most important issues two nations face today. Participants of the working group on Education & Foreign Area Studies sought in their research to explore whether bilateral exchanges do in fact serve as an effective tool for producing area studies knowledge in the situation when both the US and Russia have undergone a sharp decline in skilled expertise. The results of the project provide strong evidence for positive program outcomes, especially regarding language acquisition and cultural competence. However, the participants of the project also find that the reviewed orientation pre-exchange materials often contained non-neutral language that may reinforce pre-existing stereotypes.

About the Authors

E. Akimova
University of Oxford, St. Antony’s College.
United States
Akimova Evelina T. – postgraduate student, Faculty of Sociology.


Z. Dzhafarova
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”.
Russian Federation
Dzhafarova Zibeyda I. – graduate student, Institute of Education.


D. Kurkovskiy
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.
Ukraine
Kurkovskiy David L. – Parker Huang fellowship, Yale University; international research student, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy


E. Rodina
School of Communication, Northwestern University.
Russian Federation
Rodina Elena A. – postgraduate student, Media, Technology, and Society Program.


K. Schroeder
University of Pennsylvania Law School
Russian Federation
Schroeder Katherine – postgraduate student.


References

1. The authors would like to express their gratitude to Victoria Zhuravleva and the SURF leadership team for their invaluable help with the paper.

2. Aref’ev A., Sukholutskaya M. American Students in Russia: Research and Data Analysis of Exchange Programs // American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2015. Vol. 12. № 10. P. 723–733.

3. Legvold R. Return to Cold War. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016; Monaghan A.A. “New Cold War”? Abusing History, Misunderstanding Russia. L.: Chatham House, 2015.

4. Horowitz J. Russia Experts See Thinning Ranks’ Effect on US Policy [Online resource] // The New York Times. 2014. March 6. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/07/world/europe/american-experts-on-russia.html?_r=0 (accessed 18.09.2016).

5. Tsygankov A. Why Russia Expertise in the US Still Has a Long Way to Go // Russia Direct. 2016. Vol 4. № 3. P. 11.

6. Zhuravleva V. The Role of Academia in Fostering Better US-Russia Relations // Russia Direct. 2016. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 16.

7. DeLong M. et al. Cultural Exchange: Evaluating an Alternative Model in Higher Education // Journal of Studies in International Education. 2009. Vol. 15. № 1. P. 41–56.

8. Freed B.F. An Overview of Issues and Research in Language Learning in a Study Abroad Setting // The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad. 1998. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 31–60.

9. Freed B.F. Op. cit.; Paige M. et al. Study Abroad for Global Engagement: The Long-term Impact of Mobility Experiences // Intercultural Education. 2009. № 20. P. 29–44.

10. Freed B.F. Op. cit. P. 32.

11. Brecht R. Qualitative Analysis of Second Language Acquisition in Study Abroad: The ACTR/NFLC Project // Washington DC: National Foreign Language Center, 1993.

12. Dwyer M.M. More is better: The Impact of Study Abroad Program Duration // Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad. 2004. Vol. 10. P. 151–163.

13. Atkinson C. Does Soft Power Matter? A Comparative Analysis of Student Exchange Programs 1980–2006 // Foreign Policy Analysis. 2010. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 1–22; DeLong M. et al. Op. cit.

14. Ibid. P. 41.

15. Paige M. et al. Op. cit.

16. Regan V., Howard M., Lemée I. The Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Competence in a Study Abroad Context. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters, 2009; McKay S., Hornberger N. (eds.) Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching. The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series. N. Y.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.

17. Kumagai A., Lypson M. Beyond Cultural Competence: Critical Consciousness, Social Justice, and Multicultural Education // Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2009. Vol. 84. № 6. P. 782–787.

18. Lee A. et al. Special Issue: Engaging Diversity in Undergraduate Classrooms – A Pedagogy for Developing Intercultural Competence // ASHE Higher Education Report. 2012. Vol. 38. № 2. P. 1–132.

19. Salisbury M.H. The effect of study abroad on intercultural competence among undergraduate college students: PhD thesis. Univ. of Iowa, 2011. http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1073

20. Regan V., Howard M., Lemée I. Op. cit.; Salisbury M.H. Op. cit.

21. Schloss H. Three Problems of International Student Exchange Programs // Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors. 1955. Vol. 41. № 3. P. 573.

22. Rose-Redwood C.R., Rose-Redwood R.S. Self-Segregation or Global Mixing? Social Interactions and the International Student Experience // Journal of College Student Development. 2013. Vol. 54. № 4. P. 413–429.

23. Title VIII Funding Cut [Online Resource] // Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. URL: http://www.aseees.org/advocacy/title-viii-funding-cut (accessed 20.11.2016).

24. Nye J.S. Soft Power // Foreign Policy. 1990. № 80. P. 153–171.

25. Dolinsky A. Educational Exchanges in Public Diplomacy: Russian and International Experience // Vestnik MGIMO University. 2014. Vol. 35. № 2. P. 56–62.

26. Sergeev S. Academic Mobility as a Tool of Soft Power of Science // Humanities, Social-Economics and Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 198–201.

27. Coclanis P. Study Abroad’s Seven Deadly Sins [Online resource] // The New York Times. 2016. April 8. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/10/education/edlife/study-abroads-seven-deadly-sins.html (accessed 23.10.2016).

28. Rose-Redwood C.R., Rose-Redwood R.S. Op. cit.; Shannon-Baker P.A. Microaggressions, Self-Segregation, and Performing Gender: Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Culture Shock in a Study Abroad Program. Univ. of Cincinnati, 2015 http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1447690476; Ward C., Kennedy A. The Measurement of Sociocultural Adaptation // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 1999. Vol. 23. № 4. P. 659–677.

29. Kumagai A., Lypson M. Op. cit.; Lee A. et al. Op. cit.; Schloss H. Op. cit.

30. Deardorff D.K. Internationalization: In Search of Intercultural Competence // International Educator. 2004. Vol. 13. № 2. P. 13–15.


Review

For citations:


Akimova E., Dzhafarova Z., Kurkovskiy D., Rodina E., Schroeder K. Why study abroad? A mixed-methods evaluation of the effectiveness of US–Russia academic exchange programs. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2017;(4/1):47-57.

Views: 331


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6339 (Print)