The efficiency of the state institution and the stateless society development perspective

For a long time the hierarchically arranged system of society was considered as the most progressive to regulate complex social processes. Sharp expansion of the transport system has allowed the state to strengthen as the leading political institution. The expansion carried with it the growth of bureaucracy control over the population thus displacing all other forms of social order. For a long time it was believed that only the state could provide society with social benefits and develop the best rational solution. This very aspect is being questioned by the author. The main disadvantage of the state is the need to bear the costs of a complex bureaucratic institutional system. Technical progress, the development of a network society offers some new tools to make collective decisions and create self-sufficient social benefits. Here the question arises: whether it is possible to do without the state under modern conditions?

For most of its history, mankind lived in a stateless society. Now, more than 100 million people of the world population are minimally affected by the state, both in the leading countries and in the hard-to-reach underdeveloped territories. Absence of the state has both disadvantages and advantages. In a stateless society, the risks of reducing the level of well-being are lowered in case there is sufficient social capital and groups are rationally chosen.

The article raises the questions of transforming the state as a social institution and redistributing its functions within the society. In addition, the author highlights possible perspectives for a stateless organization of society, and conditions for the sustainable existence of anarchy.

1. North D. Institutions, institutional changes and the functioning of the economy. Moscow: Fond ekonomicheskoi knigi “Nachala” Publ.; 1997. 180 p. (In Russ.)

2. Hall J., Schroeder R. An anatomy of power: the social theory of Michael Mann. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006. 410 p.

3. Оlson M. The logic of collective action: Public goods and group theory. Moscow: Fond ekonomicheskoi initsiativy Publ.; 1995. 165 p. (In Russ.)

4. Buchanan JM. Boundaries of freedom. Between anarchy and Leviathan. Nobel laureates in economics: James Buchanan. Moscow: Taurus-Al’fa Publ.; 1997. 482 p. (In Russ.)

5. Auzan A. Economy of everything. How institutions change our lives. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber Publ.; 2016. 160 p. (In Russ.)

6. Nikolaeva U. Informal service exchange networks. Formation mechanisms, historical analogues, models of social solidarity: Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference “Power and Control Diagnostics. Communication mechanisms and “double standards”. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii RAN Publ.; 2017. p. 190-204. (In Russ.)

7. Van Dijk J. The Network Society Social Aspects of New Media. 2nd edition, London: SAGE Publ.; 2006. 292 p.

8. The Fragile States Index (FSI), The Fund for Peace. [Internet]. [data obrashche- niya 2 Apr. 2018]. URL: http://fundforpeace.org/fsi/

9. Auzan A. The crisis of expectations and variants of the social contract. Social sciences and contemporary world. 2004;5:16-23. (In Russ.)

10. Auzan A. Institutional theory of the state: A cycle of public lectures. [Internet]. [data obrashcheniya 4 Apr. 2018]. URL: http://lectoriy.mipt.ru/lecturer/AuzanAA/lectures (In Russ.)

11. Scott J. The Art of Being Uncontrollable. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo Publ.; 2017. 568 p. (In Russ.)

12. Hirshleifer J. The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. 496 p.