Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"

Advanced search

Some peculiarities of the Persian culture of behavior in the context of historical and cultural identity of the Persian people

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2019-3-131-147

Abstract

The article analyzes the characteristics of the culture of behavior and the mentality of modern Persians in the context of the historical features of the formation of their identity. The article contains a brief history of the formation of the Persian ethnocultural identity, which has several important components: Iranian (Indo-European, pre-Islamic), Arab-Islamic and Turkic. Under the Safavids a Shiite version of Islam was established in Iran, and under the Pahlavi dynasty an attempt was made to abandon Arab-Islamic elements in all spheres of life, which was one of the reasons for discontent of a large part of the people and the 1979 Islamic revolution. Currently, a large number of Iranians are becoming increasingly disappointed in the Islamic regime and wish the country to develop culturally according to a western pattern. The article analyzes the features of the Persian culture of behavior based on the observations of the authors of R. Lewis theory. The Persian culture of behavior belongs to the multi-active – reactive type, since multi-active (disorganization, lack of coordination, the habit of doing several things at once, a very large role of live communication) and reactive (listening skills, humility and respect for the interlocutor) features are mixed in the Persian national character. In this sense, it is very similar to the culture of behavior of the Turks. Currently the process of secularization takes place in Iran; however, the majority of the population remains loyal to the traditional pattern of behavior. A noticeable part of Persian atheists is experiencing a crisis of traditional culture.

About the Authors

N. A. Filin
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Nikita A. Filin, Ph.D. in History, associate professor, bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, Russia, GSP-3, 125993


A. S. Khodunov
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Alexander S. Khodunov, postgraduate student, bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, Russia, GSP-3, 125993


References

1. Betteridge AH. Gift exchange in Iran: The locus of self-identity in social interaction. Anthropological Quarterly. 1985;4:190-202.

2. Gable RW. Culture and administration in Iran. Middle East Journal. 1959;4:407-21.

3. Lewis RD. Business cultures in the international business: from conflict to comprehension. Moscow: Delo Publ.; 1999. 439 p. [In Russ.]

4. Geertz C. The interpretation of cultures. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ.; 2004. 558 p. [In Russ.]

5. Alekseev VP. The becoming of the mankind. 5 vols. Vol. 1: Anthropogenesis. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 2007. 720 p. [In Russ.]

6. Proshin NI., ed. Foreign Asia. Overall Review. Southwest Asia. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ.; 1979. 381 p. [In Russ.]

7. Rashidvash V. Iranian people: Iranian ethnic groups. International Journal of Humanities and Social Scene. 2013;15:216-26.

8. Edelman JI. Iranian and Slavic Languages: a Historical Relationship. Moscow: Vostochnaya literature Publ.; 2002. 230 p. [In Russ.]

9. Zhigalina OI. Ethno-social Evolution of the Iranian Society. Moscow: Vostochnaya literature Publ.; 1996. 264 p. [In Russ.]

10. Petrushevskii IP. Islam in Iran in 8th – 15th centuries. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo universiteta Publ.; 1966. 398 p. [In Russ.]

11. Ripinskaya P. These Amazing Iranians. Moscow: АSТ Publ.; Аstrel’ Publ.; 2007. 220 p. [In Russ.]

12. Mutahhari M. Islam and Iran: History of Relations. Saint Petersburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie Publ.; 2008. 480 p. [In Russ.]

13. Doroshenko EA. The Shia Clergy in Modern Iran. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1985. 228 p. [In Russ.]

14. Tishchenko SM., Khaltrina DA., Korotaev AV. Social and Psychological Peculiarities of the Modern World Civilizations (according to the Results of the “World Values” Project). The System monitoring of global and regional risks. Moscow: LKI/URSS Publ.; 2010. P. 379-410. [In Russ.]

15. Vakil M., Nadrian H., Fathipoor M., Boniadi F., Morowatisharifabad MA. Prevalence and Determinants of Intimate Partner Violence against Women in Kazeroon, Islamic Republic of Iran. Violence and Victims. 2010;6:116-27.

16. Ahmadi Z. Politeness and Concept “Ta’arof” in Iranian Culture. Science and School, 2014;3:102-06. [In Russ.]

17. Sahragard R. A Cultural Script Analysis of a Politeness Feature in Persian. Kyung-Ja Park, Michiko Nakano, eds., Proceedings of the 8th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics. Tokyo: PAAL Japan, 2014. P. 399-423.

18. Aliev AA. Iran vs Iraq: History and Modern Time. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta Publ.; 2012. 768 p. [In Russ.]


Review

For citations:


Filin N.A., Khodunov A.S. Some peculiarities of the Persian culture of behavior in the context of historical and cultural identity of the Persian people. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2019;(3):131-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2019-3-131-147

Views: 730


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6339 (Print)