Evolution of the EU’s policy of tackling disinformation. A multistakeholder approach
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2023-2-42-59
Abstract
The ongoing transformation of the digital space has modified the threat of online disinformation. Various actors search for the ways to mitigate its negative impact. This article examines the counter disinformation actions of the European Union. These actions rely on the cooperation of the EU institutions with civil society and online platforms. The goal of this study is to assess the involvement of various stakeholders in the process of countering disinformation through the analysis of the existing EU programs and strategies. The article studies the evolution of the EU’s policy and is based on a multistakeholder analysis of the disinformation-countering process. The study revealed the EU’sstrong reliance on civilsociety and platforms, as well as a lack oftransparent mechanisms to monitor the implementation of the adopted plans and strategies. The EU externalizes the threat and places excessive emphasis on the self-control of platforms. Yet, the negative impact of disinformation on society becomes recognized in the related EU policies (cybersecurity, education, etc.). This article illustrates important experience and indicates the EU’s strategic vision in tackling disinformation.
About the Author
Yu. Yu. Kolotaev
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yury Yu. Kolotaev, postgraduate student
bld. 1/3, Smolny St., Saint Petersburg, 191060
References
1. Antonova, S. (2011), “ ‘Capacity-building’ in global Internet governance. The longterm outcomes of ‘multistakeholderism’ ”, Regulation & Governance, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 425–445. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01117.x.
2. Braun, K. and Dodge, J. (2018), “Critical policy studies and the politics of posttruth politics”, Critical Policy Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–2. DOI: 10.1080/ 19460171.2018.1444498.
3. Chugrov, S.V. (2017), “Post-truth. Transformation of political reality or self-destruction of liberal democracy?”, Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, vol. 2, pp. 42–59, DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.02.04.
4. D’Ancona, M. (2017), Post truth, Ebury Press, London, UK. Das, R. and Ahmed, W. (2021), “Rethinking fake news. Disinformation and ideology during the time of COVID-19 Global Pandemic”, IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 146–159. DOI: 10.1177/22779752211027382.
5. Durach, F., Bârgăoanu, A. and Nastasiu, C. (2020), “Tackling disinformation. EU regulation of the digital space”, Romanian Journal of European Affairs, vol. 20, pp. 5–20.
6. Nenadić, I. (2019), “Unpacking the ‘European approach’ to tackling challenges of disinformation and political manipulation”, Internet Policy Review, vol. 8, no. 4, DOI: 10.14763/2019.4.1436.
7. Pitruzzella, G. and Pollicino, O. (2020), Disinformation and hate speech, Bocconi University Press, Milano, Italy.
8. Raymond, M. and DeNardis, L. (2015), “Multistakeholderism. Anatomy of an inchoate global institution”, International Theory, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 572–616, DOI: 10.1017/ S1752971915000081.
9. Romanova, T., Sokolov, N. and Kolotaev, Yu. (2020), “Disinformation (fake news, propaganda) as a threat to resilience. Approaches used in the EU and its member state Lithuania”, Baltic region, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 53–67, DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2020-1-4.
10. Sakwa, R. (2021), “The pandemic, Russia and the West”, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–19, DOI: 10.21638/spbu06.2021.101.
11. Sharikov, P. and Stepanova, N. (2019). US, Europe and Russia Approaches to the Problem of the Information Policy, Sovremennaya Evropa, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 73–83. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope220197383.
12. Shu, K., Bhattacharjee, A., Alatawi, F., Nazer, T., Ding, K., Karami, M. and Liu, H. (2020), “Combating disinformation in a social media age”, WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 10, no. 6, DOI: 10.1002/widm.1385.
Review
For citations:
Kolotaev Yu.Yu. Evolution of the EU’s policy of tackling disinformation. A multistakeholder approach. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2023;(2):42-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2023-2-42-59
Views:
286
Email this article 