Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"

Advanced search

Features of elections to the Sámi parliaments in Norway, Sweden and Finland

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2024-3-103-119

Abstract

The 2011 Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation concerning human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous peoples for the first time identified Sámi parliaments as important models of the indigenous people’s self-governance and participation in political decision-making. Moreover, in the report it was noted that other countries could take the example of the Scandinavian countries, namely Norway, Sweden, and Finland, and develop similar institutions. To understand why the Sámi parliaments are of the best modern models for indigenous people’s political representation, it is necessary to analyse the model from different angles. Thus, the article deals with the formation of representative bodies of the Sámi through elections. The article addresses the following questions: who has the right to vote, what level of turnout occurs is observed in elections, how the system of constituencies is formed, who can and does take part in elections as candidates, who is represented in the parliaments, who controls the selection of representatives, and, finally, does such an electoral system expand or limit the opportunities for political participation of the Sámi people? The author concludes that the system of elections to the Sami Parliaments contributes to increasing the political participation of the Sami due to easier access to registration in the voter register. At the same time, the system of elections to the Sami Parliament in Norway is the most effective both in terms of the level of political involvement of the Sami and in terms of the level of representativeness, which is associated with the most liberal criteria for registration in the voter register and with the special organization of the constituency system.

About the Author

M. V. Bukovska
Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University
Russian Federation

Margarita V. Bukovska, Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University

17, Severnoi Dviny Emb., Arkhangelsk, 163002



References

1. Anisimov, S.A., Tolmachev, V.P. and Shirokova, A.I. (2014), “Features of the Organization of the Saami Parliament as an elected representative body in the state on the example of Norway”, Eurasian Union of Scientists, no. 8, part 2, pp. 82–83.

2. Anufriev, V.A. and Minin, A.I. (2018), “Socio-political distinctions in the life of the Sami living in Fennoscandia”, Vestnik sovremennykh issledovanii, vol. 22, no. 7.3, pp. 36–39.

3. Berg-Nordlie, M. (2015), “Representation in Sápmi. Four States, Four Approaches to Indigenous Inclusion”, in Bjerkli, B. and Selle, P., ed., Samepolitikkens utvikling, Gyldendal Norsk Forlag, Oslo, Norway, pp. 388–418.

4. Eriksson, J. (1997), Partition and redemption. A Machiavellian analysis of Sami and Basque patriotism, Department of Political Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

5. Garipov, R.Sh. (2013), “Evolution of indigenous rights in international law. From genocide to UN Declaration”, Istoriya gosudarstva i prava, no. 7, pp. 45–48.

6. Goodin, R.E. (1996), The theory of institutional design, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

7. Josefsen, E., Mörkenstam, U. and Saglie, J. (2017), “Sametingene – institusjoner for selvbestemmelse?”, in Josefsen, E., Mörkenstam, U., Nilsson, R. and Saglie, J., ed., Ett folk, ulike valg: Sametingsvalg i Norge og Sverige, Gyldendal Norsk Forlag, Oslo, Norway, pp. 24–55.

8. Maksimenko, A.S. (2018), “Ethnopolitical movement of the Sami in the Arctic region. Challenges of our time”, in Proceedings of the First International Scientific and Practical Conference “The Attraction of the North: Language, Literature, Society”, part 1, Petrozavodsk State University, Petrozavodsk, Russia, pp. 482–489.

9. Moroz, E.N. (2021), “Exercise of rights of the indigenous peoples on the example of Norway’s policy towards Sami population”, Politika i obshchestvo, no. 1, pp. 41–49.

10. Sarivaara, E.K. (2012), Sámi without status. Locations on the borders of Sámi’ perspectives. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland.

11. Selle, P., Semb, A.J., Strømsnes, K. and Nordø, Å.D. (2015), Den samiske medborgeren, Gyldendal, Oslo, Norway.

12. Semerina, O.A. (2018), “Legal status of the Sami in Finland. Threat to national identity”, International Relations and the Dialogue of Cultures, no. 6, pp. 78–91.

13. Sirkka, K.-W. (2017), Fra idé til faktura. Fra samepolitikk til politikk for Sametinget, Kolofon, Oslo, Norway. Yudin, V.I. (2011), “State policy of the Nordic countries towards the Sami people”, Vlast’, no. 10, pp. 164–168.

14. Zadorin, M.Yu. (2012), “Forms of self-determination of indigenous peoples. Example of the Sami”, Nauchnaya diskussiya: voprosy yurisprudentsii, no. 4, pp. 22–25.


Review

For citations:


Bukovska M.V. Features of elections to the Sámi parliaments in Norway, Sweden and Finland. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2024;(3):103-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2024-3-103-119

Views: 132


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6339 (Print)