The role of the Movement for the Liberation of Iran in the Islamic Revolution 1978–1979
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2024-5-162-176
Abstract
The author of the article attempted to study the role of the national-religious group “Liberation movement in Iran” and its leader Mehdi Bazargan in the anti-Shah movement and the Islamic Revolution in Iran 1978–1979. The article considers the development of allied relations between the LMI and the moderate clergy, reviews the role of the LMI in organizing protest actions, as well as its place in the lineup of opposition forces in Iran for the 1978. The author believes that during the development of anti-Shah protests, the LMI, especially M. Bazargan himself, made efforts to preserve the supremacy for himself and the LMI in the development of the revolutionary movement, despite the growing popularity of R. Khomeini, and also suppressed all attempts by the clergy to move forward. The author puts forward the thesis that Bazargan, in order to maintain control over the revolutionary movement in January 1978, sought to use the army against the radical wing of the clergy and Ayatollah Khomeini. Interpreting such complex and multidimensional phenomena that occurred in Iran in 1978–1979, the author suggests that the LMI should be considered as an influential opposition group as the clergy.
Keywords
About the Author
E. V. KhatuntsevRussian Federation
Egor V. Khatuntsev
6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. Abrahamian, E. A. (1982), Iran between two revolutions, Princeton University Press,New Jersey, USA.
2. Agaev, S.L. (1981), Iran v proshlom i nastoyashchem (puti i formy revolyutsionnogo protsessa) [Iran in the past and present (ways and forms of the revolutionary process)], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.
3. Aliev, S.M. (2004), Istoriya Irana: XX vek [History of Iran. 20 th century], Institut vostokovedeniya RAN, Moscow, Russia.
4. Arabajyan, A.Z. (1983), Iran: Izmeneniya v otraslevoi strukture ekonomiki v 60–70-kh godakh (K probleme lomki kolonial’noi struktury ekonomiki) [Iran. Changes in the sectoral structure of the economy in the 60–70s (On the issue of breaking the colonial structure of the economy)], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.
5. Arjomand, S.A. (1988), The turban for the crown. The Islamic Revolution in Iran, Oxford Univercity Press, New York, USA.
6. Baqi, E. (1994), Tahrir-e tarikh-e shafahi-ye enqelab-e eslami-ye Iran (Oral history of the Islamic revolution in Iran), Tafakkor, Tehran, Iran.
7. Bazargan, M. (1983), Showra-ye enqelab va dowlat-e movaqqat [Revolutionary Council and Provisional Government], Nashr, Tehran, Iran.
8. Chehabi, H. (1990), Iranian politics and religious modernism. The liberation movement of Iran under the shah and Khomeini, Cornell University Press, New York, USA.
9. Doroshenko, E.A. (1985), Shiitskoe dukhovenstvo v sovremennom Irane [Shia clergy in modern Iran], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.
10. Jahanbakhsh, F. (2001), Islam, democracy and religious modernism in Iran (1953–2000). From Bazargan to Soroush, Brill, London, UK, Boston, USA.
11. Keddie, N. (2003), Modern Iran. Roots and results of revolution, Yale University Press, New Haven, USA.
12. Rahnema, A. (2023), The political history of modern Iran. Revolution, reaction and transformation, 1905 to the present, I.B. Tauris, London, UK.
13. Sklyarov, L.E. (1989), “Entry into the struggle of the working class and the development of a revolutionary situation into a revolution”, in Iranskaya revolyutsiya 1978–1979 gg.: Prichiny i uroki [Iranian Revolution of 1978–1979. Сauses and lessons], Nauka, Moscow, USSR, pp. 105–112.
14. Sklyarov, L.E. (1989), “The emergence of the anti-Shah movement and its evolution”, in Iranskaya revolyutsiya 1978–1979 gg.: Prichiny i uroki [Iranian Revolution of 1978–1979. Сauses and lessons], Nauka, Moscow, USSR, pp. 98–105.
15. Zabih, S. (1982), Iran since the revolution, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.
Review
For citations:
Khatuntsev E.V. The role of the Movement for the Liberation of Iran in the Islamic Revolution 1978–1979. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2024;(5):162-176. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2024-5-162-176