Strategies of partnership of the society with the power under conditions of deliberative cyberdemocracy. The concept and prospects of its realization
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of main issues of organizing the civil online deliberation that arise while studying the attempts of putting into practice the deliberative cyber democracy model. The model is based on a synthesis of M. Poster’s cyber democracy ideas and J. Bessette’s concept of the consultative or deliberative democracy. The author analyzes the way certain cyber democracy elements are being employed in South Korea paying special attention to the experiments in the field of online deliberation which reveals the potential of the network of the Internet dialogue and Internet-discussions as a new tool employed by citizens to participate in modern politics.
References
1. Винер Н. Человеческое использование человеческих существ: кибернетика и общество // Винер Н. Человек управляющий. СПб.: Питер, 2001. С. 161.
2. Всеобщая декларация прав человека [Электронный ресурс] // Организация Объединенных Наций. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/universal-declarationhuman-rights/index.html (дата обращения: 27.11.2016).
3. Poster M. CyberDemocracy: Internet and the Public Sphere // American Cultural Studies: A Reader / Ed. by J. Hartley, R.E. Pearson. Oxford; N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2000. P. 402-413.
4. Bessette J. Deliberative democracy: The majority principle in republican government // How democratic is the Constitution? Washington: AEI Press, 1980. P. 102-116.
5. Грачев M.Н. Технологии электронной демократии: проекты и пути их реализации // Политическое проектирование: глобальное, национальное, региональное измерения / Под ред. М.Н. Грачева, Н.А. Борисова. М.: Мир философии, 2016. С. 84.
6. Ook L. Understanding cyber-democracy with the critical social theory // Issues in Information Systems. 2005. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 266-272.
7. Amnesty International: Власти Южной Кореи подавляют свободу слова [Электронный ресурс] // Amnesty International. URL: https://amnesty.org.ru/node/2391/ (дата обращения: 24.11.2016).
8. Девять медиков в Южной Корее обвинены в госизмене и пропаганде в пользу КНДР [Электронный ресурс] // Информационное агентство России «ТАСС»: Международная панорама. 2015, 1 декабря. URL: http://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/2489169 (дата обращения: 24.11.2016).
9. Fishkin J.S. Virtual Public Consultation: Prospects for Internet Deliberative Democracy // Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice / Ed. by Т. Davies, S.P. Gangadharan. Stanford CA: Center for the study of language and information, 2009. P. 23-35.
10. Price V. Citizens Deliberating Online: Theory and Some Evidence // Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice / Ed. by Т. Davies, S.P. Gangadharan. Stanford CA: Center for the study of language and information, 2009. P. 37-58.
11. Lupia A. Can Online Deliberation Improve Politics? Scientific Foundations for Success // Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice / Ed. by Т. Davies, S.P. Gangadharan. Stanford CA: Center for the study of language and information, 2009. P. 59-69.
12. Kelly J., Fisher D., Smith M. Friends, Foes, and Fringe: Norms and Structure in Political Discussion Networks // Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice / Ed. by Т. Davies, S.P. Gangadharan. Stanford CA: Center for the study of language and information, 2009. P. 83-93.
13. Live-On A., Manin B. Happy Accidents: Deliberation and Online Exposure to Opposing Views // Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice / Ed. by Т. Davies, S.P. Gangadharan. Stanford CA: Center for the study of language and information, 2009. P. 105-122.
Review
For citations:
Barakhoev R. Strategies of partnership of the society with the power under conditions of deliberative cyberdemocracy. The concept and prospects of its realization. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2017;(1):63-70. (In Russ.)
Views:
210
Email this article 