Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations"

Advanced search

Policy of optimizing the intraregional space of the Russian Federation: issues of asymmetrical federalism and spatial development

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2026-1-187-217

Abstract

The article examines the policy of optimizing the intraregional space of the Russian Federation in the context of issues of asymmetrical federalism and spatial development. The relevance of this topic stems from the persistent disparities in the socio-economic development of Russia’s regions and the historically entrenched asymmetry in their politico-legal status. The Introduction substantiates the importance of researching balanced regional development and overcoming the consequences of asymmetrical federalism. The “Materials and Methods” section describes the sources used (scholarly publications, legal acts, statistical data) and the approaches applied (historical-political analysis, institutional comparison, elements of regional statistical analysis). The “Discussion” section provides a literature review: it highlights key works on the formation and adaptation of asymmetrical federalism in Russia, as well as domestic and foreign researchers’ approaches to problems of territorial development. The “Results” section analyzes the evolution of Russia’s regional policy from the 1990s to the present – from the signing of the Federative Treaty in 1992 to the adoption of the Spatial Development Strategy before 2036. It shows that the federal center has taken steps to unify federal relations (abolishing certain region-specific agreements, merging smaller regions), while simultaneously attempting to equalize levels of territorial development. Data is presented demonstrating the continuing wide divergence of regions on key indicators (for example, the gap in gross regional product per capita between the most and least developed subjects exceeds 60-fold). The Spatial Development Strategy is considered as a modern tool of optimization, however its inherent shortcomings are noted (focus on supporting agglomerations at the expense of periphery, etc.). In conclusion, the findings are summarized: despite a formal reduction in the asymmetry of federalism, the problems of spatial development necessitate a sustained adaptive policy that takes into account regional differentiation and ensures a balance between the country’s unity and its territorial diversity.

About the Authors

E. E. Kochetkov
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University; Russian University of Transport (MIIT)
Russian Federation

Egor E. Kochetkov, Cand. of Sci. (Political Science), associate professor

14, Alexander Nevsky St., Kaliningrad, 236041;  bld. 9,
Obraztsova St., Russia, 127994



A. A. Niklaus
Moscow State University of Psychology and Social Sciences
Russian Federation

Anna A. Niklaus, associate professor

9A, 4th Roshchinsky passage, Moscow, 115191



References

1. Fadeicheva, M.A. (2011), “From subject to object: new trends in Russia’s regional policy”, in 20 let postsovetskoi Rossii: krizisnye yavleniya i mekhanizmy modernizatsii: materialy XIV Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii Gumanitarnogo universiteta [20 years of post-Soviet Russia: crisis phenomena and modernization mechanisms. Proceedings of the 14th All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference of the University of Humanities], Gumanitarnyi universitet, Ekaterinburg, Russia, pp. 399–402.

2. Fedyakin, A.V. and Kochetkov, E.E. (2009), “Searching for the optimum form of territorial and political system of modern Russia (the review of scientific and political discussions)”, Politicheskaya nauka, no. 1, pp. 108–136.

3. Fedyakin, A.V. (2005), “Image of state as a problem of modern political science”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12: Politicheskie nauki, no. 3, pp. 3–18.

4. Hale, H.E. (2004), “Divided we stand: Institutional sources of ethnofederal state survival and collapse”, World Politics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 165–193.

5. Kochetkov, E.E. (2011), “Federative treaty and the formation of asymmetrical federalism in modern Russia”, Vestnik Rossiiskoi natsii, no. 3, pp. 185–188.

6. Kochetkov, E.E. (2013), “Symmetry and asymmetry of a federal state as a reflection of territorial-political and legal differentiation”, Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnye kadry, no. 6, pp. 218–223.

7. Kochetkov, E.E. (2014), “Issues of adaptation of asymmetrical federalism in modern Russia”, Poisk: Politika. Obshchestvovedenie. Iskusstvo. Sotsiologiya. Kul’tura, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 84–93.

8. Kochetkov, E.E. (2018), Adaptirovannyy asimmetrichnyy federalizm kak kompleksnyy ob’yekt issledovaniya [Adapted asymmetrical federalism as a complex object of research]. Sotsial’no-politicheskaya mysl’, Moscow, Russia.

9. Kochetkov, E.E. (2018), “Model of optimization of the territorial-political structure of Russia”, in Gorbunov, A.A. and Fedyakin, A.V., eds., Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya transporta: Trudy XI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Problems and prospects of transport development: Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific and Practical Conference], vol. 1, Sotsial’no-politicheskaya mysl’, Moscow, Russia, pp. 88–97.

10. Kochetkov, E.E. (2024), “On the issue of adaptation policy of asymmetrical federalism”, in Gaman-Golutvin, O.V., Mchedlov, M.M. and Timofeev, L.N., eds., Rossiya v politsentrichnom mirovom poryadke: vyzovy i novye paradigmy razvitiya [Russia in a polycentric world order: challenges and new development paradigms], Aspekt Press, Moscow, Russia, pp. 301–302.

11. Leksin, V.N. and Shvetsov, A.N. (2024), “Natural and regulatory-imperative in Russia’s spatial development”, Federalizm, no. 2, pp. 9–31.

12. Martinez-Vazquez, J. Asymmetric federalism in Russia: Cure or poison? in Bird, R.M. and Ebel, R.D., eds., International studies in fiscal decentralization, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 241–268.

13. Seliverstov, V.E. Melnikova, L.V., Kolomak, E.A., Kryukov, V.A., Suslov, V.I. and Suslov, N.I. (2019), “Spatial development strategy of Russia: expectations and realities”, Regional Research of Russia, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 155–163.

14. Shaikhutdinova, G.R. (2020), Contemporary Russian Federalism: Delimitation of Jurisdictional Subjects and Powers, T.M.C. Asser Press, Kazan: Kazan University Press, Russia.

15. Srivastava, R. (2023), “Federalism in Russia After 1991’, International Studies, vol. 60, iss. 1, pp. 197–208.

16. Treisman, D. (1999), After the Deluge: regional crises and political consolidation in Russia, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, USA.

17. Watts, R.L. (1999), Comparing federal systems, School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University Press, Kingston, Jamaica.

18. Zubarevich, N.V. (2012), “Four Russias: human potential and social differentiation of Russian regions and cities”, in Russia 2025: Scenarios for the Future, Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK, pp. 67–85.

19. Zubarevich, N.V. (2014), Regional’noe razvitie i regionalʹnaya politika v Rossii [Regional development and regional policy in Russia], EKO: Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal, vol. 478, no. 4, pp. 7–27.


Review

For citations:


Kochetkov E.E., Niklaus A.A. Policy of optimizing the intraregional space of the Russian Federation: issues of asymmetrical federalism and spatial development. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". 2026;1(1):187-217. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2026-1-187-217

Views: 181

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6339 (Print)